Answer / om p

A company is any form of business wheather small or large.
Generally the term "Company" indicates a particular kind of
business dealing in a very particular product.
Orgnisation is the larger form and generally comprises a
number of companies.
Industry is the combination of companies in same line of
business. Ex: Steel Industry includes all steel companies .

Answer / priya

A company can be a private limited company and also a
government aided company .
An Organisation is a joint venture and run by many people
and run by direct or indirect investments
An industry is the place where employees undergo the work
for the organisation where production takes place

Answer / shahbaz younis

The term industry is used to refer to a group of companies
who make similar products. The auto INDUSTRY has many
COMPANIES like Ford, GM, Toyota, Honda, BMW, etc etc.

Answer / shahed uzzal

First of all the difference between a company, industry and
organization is the same as that of son, father and
grandfather. Now think that what is the difference between
the firm and company? yes, suppose that you produce steel as
a same line at three locations like Dhaka, Rajshahi and
Kushtia. Each of these is called firm and all of these are
called company. The combination of all types of steel
production companies are called Industry. The combination of
all types of industries are seldom called Organization.
"Shahed Mahmud, BSc.in Industrial & Production Engineering
at Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology. "

Answer / sonu

company is nothing but it is a particular kind of business
which deals with particular product.
organization means a firm where number of companies takes place.
industry is a combination of companies which are in same
geographic region i.e same product line of businesses.

Answer / rajeev

company - A particular kind of business dealing in a very
particular product.
Orgnisation - A number of companies.
Industry - The combination of companies in same kind of
business.

Answer / oyetunji ayooluwa

An enterprises is an undertaking
created for business ventures.
An organisation is coming together of
two or more people working
cooperatively with the sole aim of
maximizing profit and to achieve a goal
or objectives which cannot be
achieved by an individuals.
An industry is a combination of an
organisation in the same line of
business.

Answer / krishna sn

organization: very general term; a group of persons working
in the same direction or common goals, with a chief,
meetings, ... not unnecessarily a business, il could be a
church or an army.

industry: a group of companies making and/or selling the
same products or services
for instance: the computer industry, the sportswear industry

company: a group of 1 or many persons making and selling
products or services for a profit (if possible). The company
is owned by the shareholders, private or public.

firm: a business partnership, usually doctors or lawyers
selling services (no goods, objects or factories)

Answer / queen

A company is a unit which brings people together, put their resources together to attain a particular objective which is profit making

Answer / jyoti gupta

THE BROAD DEFINITION OF INDUSTRY IS ONE WHICH COVERS ALL THE
FIRMS PRODUCING SIMILAR PRODUCTS.
AND THE COMPANY IS ONE WHICH DEALS WITH THE PARTICULAR
PRODUCTS, SUCH AS PARTICULAR BRAND OF TOOTH PAST.

what is the difference between CEO,MD,Chairman,President

8 Answers  

i had been rejected once..,now if i remove my money which i have borrowed and the passs book entry and balance certificate of the previous one, would it do for the next interview or i have to make again new statements for just 10 days??

0 Answers   US Consulate,

why do u want to join the teaching career in management college, when u r working as a sales manager in MNC advertising company

0 Answers  

coming to ur academic progress ur percentage in graduation is decreased than ur ssc and secondary education why? give the reasons?

0 Answers  

what is the break even point

1 Answers  

why you did not selected in campus placement

6 Answers   ICFAI, ICICI,

what is just in time in inventory management strategy to improve the ROI of a business

0 Answers   Orange,

What applicable attributes / experience do you have?

1 Answers   ONGC,

What are the questions asked for BDM in IT Sector or especially in IBM with accurate answers.

0 Answers  

If one always ought to act so as to produce the best possible circumstances, then morality is extremely demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would seem strange to punish those intending to do good by sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, then they will preclude the personal projects that humans find most fulfilling. From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons. First, discussion of the simple principle provides an excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's starting point tells us about the nature of his project. Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He [must do so] because his work is best interpreted as intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral principles. [Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over- demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one find a source of moral values divorced from human preferences. Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well- intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to give them principles that represent their considered moral judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to find the best interpretation of our Constitution. This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of motivating force for which moral philosophy has traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification and ignore the entire work. On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying the content of moral principles and granting a motivating force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not seem any more likely to convince those that would reject Murphy's premises. 1) The author suggests that the application of Murphy's philosophy to the situations of two different groups: a) would help to solve the problems of one group but not of the other. b) could result in the derivation of two radically different moral principles. c) would be contingent on the two groups sharing the same fundamental beliefs. d) could reconcile any differences between the two groups. 2) Suppose an individual who firmly believes in keeping promises has promised to return a weapon to a person she knows to be extremely dangerous. According to Murphy, which of the following, if true, would WEAKEN the notion that she should return the weapon? a) She also firmly believes that it is morally wrong to assist in any way in a potentially violent act. b) She believes herself to be well-intentioned in matters of right and wrong. c) The belief that one should keep promises is shared by most members of her community. d) She derived her moral beliefs from first-principle ethical philosophy. 3) The passage implies that a moral principle derived from applying Murphy's philosophy to a particular group would be applicable to another group if: a) the first group recommended the principle to the second group. b) the moral viewpoints of the two groups do not converge. c) the members of the second group have no firmly held beliefs. d) the second group shares the same fundamental beliefs as the first group. 4) According to the passage, the existence of individuals who entirely lack a moral sense: a) confirms the notion that moral principles should be derived from the considered judgments of individuals. b) suggests a potential disadvantage of Murphy's philosophical approach. c) supports Murphy's belief that reason is necessary in cases in which intuitions are conflicting or confused. d) proves that first-principle strategies of ethical theorizing will have no more influence over the behavior of individuals than will Murphy's philosophical approach. 5) Which of the following can be inferred about "doing philosophy from the inside out?" a) Murphy was the first philosopher to employ such an approach. b) It allows no place for rational argument in the formation of ethical principles. c) It is fundamentally different from the practice of first-principle philosophy. d) It is designed to dismiss objections to the "simple principle." 6) A school board is debating whether or not to institute a dress code for the school's students. According to Murphy, the best way to come to an ethical decision would be to: a) consult the fundamental beliefs of the board members. b) analyze the results of dress codes instituted at other schools. c) survey the students as to whether or not they would prefer a dress code. d) determine whether or note a dress code has ever been instituted in the school's history.

4 Answers   Accenture, CTS, Patni, Syntel, Verizon, Wipro,

why you want do business administration and management in Us?

0 Answers  

Describe a difficult work situation / project and how you overcame

1 Answers   ONGC,