What's the difference between transferring a FSMO role and
seizing one? Which one should you NOT seize? Why?
Answer / sheik mohamed syed ali
Seizing an FSMO can be a destructive process and
should only be attempted if the existing server with the
FSMO is no longer available.
If you perform a seizure of the FSMO roles from a DC, you
need to ensure two things:
the current holder is actually dead and offline, and that
the old DC will NEVER return to the network.
If you do an FSMO role Seize and then bring the previous
holder back online, you'll have a problem.
An FSMO role TRANSFER is the graceful movement of
the roles from a live, working DC to another live DC
During the process, the current DC holding the role(s) is
updated, so it becomes aware it is no longer the role holder
Is This Answer Correct ? | 32 Yes | 2 No |
how to create the mutiple ftp site in windows 2000 server
i WISH TO WRITE MISCROSOFT DOTNET CERTIFICATION EXAM? HOW MANY PAPERS ARE THERE? PLEASE EXPLAIN ABOUT EACH PAPERS
What is WSUS server? Basci requirement of installing? difference between WSUS ans SUS? benifits of both?
mcse 2003 to mcitp upgrade paper
• What is Active Directory? • What is LDAP? • Can you connect Active Directory to other 3rd-party Directory Services? Name a few options. • Where is the AD database held? What other folders are related to AD? • What is the SYSVOL folder? • Name the AD NCs and replication issues for each NC • What are application partitions? When do I use them • How do you create a new application partition • How do you view replication properties for AD partitions and DCs? • What is the Global Catalog?
Types of routing groups
How can you determine what GPO was and was not applied for a user? Name a few ways to do that.
what is the difference between windows 2000 server and 2003 server
How do you change the DS Restore admin password?
What is forest?
what are deference bitween netbiosname &computer hostname?
What are the requirements for installing AD on a new server?