What's the difference between transferring a FSMO role and
seizing one? Which one should you NOT seize? Why?
Answer / sheik mohamed syed ali
Seizing an FSMO can be a destructive process and
should only be attempted if the existing server with the
FSMO is no longer available.
If you perform a seizure of the FSMO roles from a DC, you
need to ensure two things:
the current holder is actually dead and offline, and that
the old DC will NEVER return to the network.
If you do an FSMO role Seize and then bring the previous
holder back online, you'll have a problem.
An FSMO role TRANSFER is the graceful movement of
the roles from a live, working DC to another live DC
During the process, the current DC holding the role(s) is
updated, so it becomes aware it is no longer the role holder
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 32 Yes | 2 No |
what is the meaning of workgroup?
mcse 2003 to mcitp upgrade paper
How do you change the DS Restore admin password?
How can you determine what GPO was and was not applied for a user? Name a few ways to do that.
What are GPOs?
what is archive bit ?
What's the difference between LDIFDE and CSVDE? Usage considerations?
1 word is equal?
What is software deployment? how we do software deployment?
A Computer gets shutdown as soon as it is plugged in with a cracking noise what is the reason and how to recover it and bring to normal state?brief description what are the necessary steps taken to bring the system up to normal state?
You want to standardize the desktop environments (wallpaper, My Documents, Start menu, printers etc.) on the computers in one department. How would you do that?
Difference between IP V-4 and IP V-6?