What's the difference between transferring a FSMO role and
seizing one? Which one should you NOT seize? Why?
Answer Posted / sheik mohamed syed ali
Seizing an FSMO can be a destructive process and
should only be attempted if the existing server with the
FSMO is no longer available.
If you perform a seizure of the FSMO roles from a DC, you
need to ensure two things:
the current holder is actually dead and offline, and that
the old DC will NEVER return to the network.
If you do an FSMO role Seize and then bring the previous
holder back online, you'll have a problem.
An FSMO role TRANSFER is the graceful movement of
the roles from a live, working DC to another live DC
During the process, the current DC holding the role(s) is
updated, so it becomes aware it is no longer the role holder
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 32 Yes | 2 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What is POST?
What are application partitions? When do I use them
HI Guys...... Good day ahead How many sub domains can be added in exchange server means in a domain
Can you connect Active Directory to other 3rd-party Directory Services? Name a few options.
What are sites? What are they used for?
I want to clear the mcse in 2007. So could i get the latest dump of msce questions?
windows file/folder sharing ?
What do you do to install a new Windows 2003 R2 DC in a Windows 2003 AD?
How do you create a new application partition
Hi, I want to do asp.net certification. So please guide me how i can proceed.
Which is best insistute to learn IIS 6.0 and 7.0
Types of routing groups
Which is best among dotnet and dotnet diploma? Friends Please answer this question as soon as possible.
is the cogent cyber solution trainig centre best for .net course?
Hi can any one help me for 70-562 dumps?