Talent or Hrad work wich is most important for me?
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / sundar
Smartwork is better than Hardwork where Smartwork only
comes in if you have talent within you.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 10 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / karthik
Hardworking donkey is better than the smart working horse.
so talent is more improtant
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / sundari.s
Talented person should work hard... without hard work your
talent won't come out.... so if you worked hard surely your
talent will make a print in this universe... this is my opinion
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 0 No |
Smart work is that which is done by your brain and hard work
is done by your mind,so both work is important my life to
achieve sucess
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / kanimozhi
Talented people achieve better than hard workers.A talented
person completes any thing very sooner than the hard worker
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shankar
i think both is important cause suppose if u r a hard
worker u should have a talent otherwise if u have talent u
must have a hardworker
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / purnima
in my views talent is mandatory as if we have talent in us
then we can work hard to acheive our gaol....
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / rekha
i think some people may not understand for the first
attempt.
so if they work hard, obveosly they become talent.
this is my opinion & experiance
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
can you describe for me one or two of your most important accomplishments?
write a c program whether the given number is power of 2 or not using the bitwise operators?
If one always ought to act so as to produce the best possible circumstances, then morality is extremely demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would seem strange to punish those intending to do good by sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, then they will preclude the personal projects that humans find most fulfilling. From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons. First, discussion of the simple principle provides an excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's starting point tells us about the nature of his project. Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He [must do so] because his work is best interpreted as intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral principles. [Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over-demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one find a source of moral values divorced from human preferences. Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well-intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to give them principles that represent their considered moral judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to find the best interpretation of our Constitution. This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of motivating force for which moral philosophy has traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification and ignore the entire work. On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying the content of moral principles and granting a motivating force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not seem any more likely to convince those that would reject Murphy's premises.
plz send me eng apti ques and sbi clarical ques plz... bikranz4u@yahoo.com
SSC ? Grade ?D? Exam ENGLISH CLOSET TEST TEST-11
what are jargons?
send information about interview and apptitude test.
what is the angle (degree)between the needle reach at 11hours and seven minites
QAFCO QATAR call me for interview as Senior Network Administrator. Please let me know what kind of question they asked ? Also they said they will take Written test, any idea about this written test
how effective communication can be made ?
hi my bank of baroda written test will held on 13th march so let me know all appti question also mths question pls send me queston with answer my mail id is amrapalimohite@yahoo.com
i am a college student in our place...i have a question What is the most question use in interviewing a company for making a system analysis and design proposal. give me some exmple for the open ended question and closed ended?