Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
What is the best method to improve my communication skills
- 3 Answers
- 5721 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / sanno
right from childhood we speak hindi but we r not very
proficient in hindi yet.same with eng.if you want to
improve your eng then try to think in english.do practise
and make conducsive inv. for eng.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / lavanya
every time reading some english book and also speaking with
our friend s in english ahd the same way every day learn
few english word at the words aer use in our ordinary
speaking.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 5 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / sunil panghal
We should read newpaper in loudli voice And we should toke
to in english our frind and other persion And we toke to
our self
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 2 No |
They were having __ essential debate on __ role of girl empowerment in __ auditorium.
If one always ought to act so as to produce the best possible circumstances, then morality is extremely demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would seem strange to punish those intending to do good by sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, then they will preclude the personal projects that humans find most fulfilling. From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons. First, discussion of the simple principle provides an excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's starting point tells us about the nature of his project. Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He [must do so] because his work is best interpreted as intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral principles. [Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over-demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one find a source of moral values divorced from human preferences. Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well-intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to give them principles that represent their considered moral judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to find the best interpretation of our Constitution. This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of motivating force for which moral philosophy has traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification and ignore the entire work. On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying the content of moral principles and granting a motivating force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not seem any more likely to convince those that would reject Murphy's premises.
what is the best example of customer service that you have come ?
shortcut key for view all formulas in the worksheet?
3 Answers eClerx, Punjab Mandi Board,
i need section engineer previous question papers.if anybody have it plzzz send to my email id :prad60@gmail.com
please send me canara bank probationary officer question paper atleast four or five papers
0 Answers Canara Bank, Central Bank of India,
please send me material of bank exam for clerical post
I have done with my engineering and i'm looking forward to prepare for civils.I've heard R C reddy is the best coaching centre in hyderabad for civils but are they any batches for civils coaching in R C reddy like other s/w coaching centres. please let me know about dat.
earlier name of newyork city was
please send me the apptitude questions for ongc exam
what is icici?
i come once in a day,twice in a hour,thrice in a minute.who am i?
English 
