Is java is a fully object object oriented language?
- 31 Answers
- 32953 Views
- TCS, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / veens4444
No, Java is not fully object oriented language.
99.9% object oriented language,bcz:
if any language is fully OO lang,means everithing should be
in the form of classes and objects.but java supports
primitive datatype of variable(int,byte..) which are not in
the form of object.
what do you say???
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 106 Yes | 14 No |
Answer / sravanthi
java is not fully supported oops concepts.
be'z several features like ... multiple inheritence &
operator overloading ... are not supported by java.
even java contains non-object premitive datatypes..
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 18 Yes | 4 No |
Answer / sanatan
Venns444 you are right but some other concepts are there
like we are declaring static members which has no
connection with the object .
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 10 Yes | 5 No |
Answer / abhijith thette nagarajan
The definition of OOP is completely satisfied by JAVA...The
reason that we have wrapper classes for primitive datatype
is just to type cast from other objects to primitive
datatypes.But still wrapper classes do satisfy the OOPs
concept..
I don't see any reason that JAVA is not a pure OOP
My stand is with JAVA saying it is OOP and moreover as far
as it is satisfying the needs with all the concepts and
resources,no point in discussing wheather it is oop or not
thank you
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 8 Yes | 4 No |
Answer / sanatan (orissa)
Please have a look, it may help you ........
There are some classes whose object can't be created.
Like 1) java.lang.Math
& 2) java.lang.System.
Because all the members are by default static.
So there is no need to create object of that classes.
Even there also no need of default constructor .
For which compiler doesn't create default constructor.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 2 No |
Answer / debakanta(orissa)
java is not fully a object oriented language.because java is
not fully supported oops concepts.and every things in java
was not classes and objects.also operator overloading are
not supported by java.
thanks.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 2 No |
Answer / srinivas
Srinivas: Lets put the discussion to an end ! Java is not
an OOP language because we cannot create an object of an
abstract class ! isis'nt it ! In this case it is violating
the concepts of OOPS ! Hence JAVA cannot be considered as
fuly object oriented language ! so....[:-p]
Srinivas ...+91998547895
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 10 Yes | 7 No |
Answer / d.mahendhar reddy
no.because it supports primitive datatypes like int byte...
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 0 No |
What is the symbol for average?
Differentiate between stringbuffer and string?
What are the steps in the jdbc connection?
When can we say that threads are not lightweight process in java?
How to print nodes of a Binary tree?
In how many ways we can create threads in java?
What do you mean by a JVM?
What are the characteristics provided in jdk1.6 apart from other versions?
What are the different data types in java?
What is meant by call by reference?
What is the symbol for space?
explain the concept of inheritance with an example?
Core Java 
