Why non nested classes in java are not having marked as
protected access specifier
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / udita bose
Sorry, but previous answer by Yayati Pavan does not answer the question. If that answer is true then there should not be a problem with a "protected" class, as "protected" keyword is wider than default one.
There are no protected class because it is unnecessary to have them. Access modifiers for classes determine 2 things
i) If a class can create instance of other class ?
ii)If a class can extend other class ?
Now, any class within the same package will be able to create an instance of "protected" class - this is true for default-accessor and public classes. No class outside the package will be able to create an instance of "protected" class - this holds good for default-accessor classes.
Again, for a "protected" class by its definition will be extendible by any class within its package - so is default-accessor class, and extendible for any class outside its package - so are all public classes.
Both of this reason nullifies the reason for a protected class.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / yayati pavan
When the non nested class declared as public or
default(public) the jvm can access the class and execute.
So non nested class must always public. other wise jvm can't
access the class.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 7 Yes | 9 No |
How do you convert an int to a string in java?
Define inheritance with reference to java.
Is java a utf 8 string?
Does google use java?
Java support what type of parameter passing ?
Which Component subclass is used for drawing and painting?
Is it possible to use Semaphore/ Mutex in an Interrupt Handler?
When should I use singleton pattern?
What do you understand by abstract classes?
What are scriptlets?
What are heterogeneous objects?
What is the maximum size of arraylist in java?