Why non nested classes in java are not having marked as
protected access specifier
Answer Posted / udita bose
Sorry, but previous answer by Yayati Pavan does not answer the question. If that answer is true then there should not be a problem with a "protected" class, as "protected" keyword is wider than default one.
There are no protected class because it is unnecessary to have them. Access modifiers for classes determine 2 things
i) If a class can create instance of other class ?
ii)If a class can extend other class ?
Now, any class within the same package will be able to create an instance of "protected" class - this is true for default-accessor and public classes. No class outside the package will be able to create an instance of "protected" class - this holds good for default-accessor classes.
Again, for a "protected" class by its definition will be extendible by any class within its package - so is default-accessor class, and extendible for any class outside its package - so are all public classes.
Both of this reason nullifies the reason for a protected class.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Can I override protected method in java?
What is package private scope in java?
What are the different approaches to implement a function to generate a random number?
What is api in java?
What is tcp and udp?
Explain the scope of a variable.
Explain the available thread states in a high-level?
Explain covariant method overriding in java.
Can we define private and protected modifiers for variables in interfaces?
What is the main function in java?
What is Hierarchy of exception?
How to make a read-only class in java?
Can we synchronize static methods in java?
Is there any way to skip finally block of exception even if some exception occurs in the exception block?
What is integer size in java?