wrong statement about c++
a)code removably
b)encapsulation of data and code
c)program easy maintenance
d)program runs faster
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / gucman
I suppose it should be a) Code reusability not
removability :)
So the wrong statement is d) program runs faster - c++ is
not faster than say C, pascal or other compiled code (it
has however very good compilers that make very aggressive
optimisations so it may look like it is faster)
a) code reusability - it's true as you can inherit the
class and use its properties and functions again modifying
it to your needs in a derived class
b) encapsulation of data and code - you can declare member
variables (data) and member functions (code) as private,
protected to encapsulate it and forbid its use outside
class instances / instances of inherited classes
c) program easy maintenance - it is true (or at least
should be true) for every oo language. If you are unsure
about this try maintenance large C program
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 10 Yes | 1 No |
When we use Abstract Class and when we use Interface?where we will implement in real time?
Write a program to find the Fibonacci series recursively.
Why do we need templates?
When is dynamic checking necessary?
How new/delete differs from malloc()/free?
What are the popular tools used to detect memory leaks in c++
Define friend function.
What is a far pointer? where we use it?
What are the techniques you use for debugging?
Explain the concept of memory leak?
Write a program to calculate the following i want a c++program for this condition 1+4+9+16+….+100 Like this (1^2+2^2) Hint use function pow(a,b)
How many standards of c++ are there?