wrong statement about c++
a)code removably
b)encapsulation of data and code
c)program easy maintenance
d)program runs faster
- 11 Answers
- 22327 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / gucman
I suppose it should be a) Code reusability not
removability :)
So the wrong statement is d) program runs faster - c++ is
not faster than say C, pascal or other compiled code (it
has however very good compilers that make very aggressive
optimisations so it may look like it is faster)
a) code reusability - it's true as you can inherit the
class and use its properties and functions again modifying
it to your needs in a derived class
b) encapsulation of data and code - you can declare member
variables (data) and member functions (code) as private,
protected to encapsulate it and forbid its use outside
class instances / instances of inherited classes
c) program easy maintenance - it is true (or at least
should be true) for every oo language. If you are unsure
about this try maintenance large C program
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 10 Yes | 1 No |
The "virtual" specifier in a member function enables which one of the following? a) Monmorphism b) Late binding c) Metamorphism d) Solomorphism e) Inheritance
Why do you use the namespace feature?
Will c++ be replaced?
Explain what are accessor methods?
What are class and object in C++?
Why do we use templates?
What are pointer-to-members in C++? Give their syntax.
What is linked list in c++?
How do you define a class in c++?
Which recursive sorting technique always makes recursive calls to sort subarrays that are about half size of the original array?
What are the syntactic rules to be avoid ambiguity in multiple inheritance?
What are the two types of polymorphism?
STL 
