wrong statement about c++
a)code removably
b)encapsulation of data and code
c)program easy maintenance
d)program runs faster
- 11 Answers
- 21376 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / gucman
I suppose it should be a) Code reusability not
removability :)
So the wrong statement is d) program runs faster - c++ is
not faster than say C, pascal or other compiled code (it
has however very good compilers that make very aggressive
optimisations so it may look like it is faster)
a) code reusability - it's true as you can inherit the
class and use its properties and functions again modifying
it to your needs in a derived class
b) encapsulation of data and code - you can declare member
variables (data) and member functions (code) as private,
protected to encapsulate it and forbid its use outside
class instances / instances of inherited classes
c) program easy maintenance - it is true (or at least
should be true) for every oo language. If you are unsure
about this try maintenance large C program
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 10 Yes | 1 No |
Why c++ is better than c language?
Define the process of handling in case of destructor failure?
How do you flush a buffer in c++?
How did c++ get its name?
How did c++ start?
Do the names of parameters have to agree in the prototype, definition, and call to the function?
What is a map in c++?
What is the c++ programming language used for?
What is meaning of in c++?
What is an iterator class in c++?
Why is c++ awesome?
What is the array and initializing arrays in c++?
STL 
