Answer Posted / gucman

I suppose it should be a) Code reusability not
removability :)

So the wrong statement is d) program runs faster - c++ is
not faster than say C, pascal or other compiled code (it
has however very good compilers that make very aggressive
optimisations so it may look like it is faster)

a) code reusability - it's true as you can inherit the
class and use its properties and functions again modifying
it to your needs in a derived class

b) encapsulation of data and code - you can declare member
variables (data) and member functions (code) as private,
protected to encapsulate it and forbid its use outside
class instances / instances of inherited classes

c) program easy maintenance - it is true (or at least
should be true) for every oo language. If you are unsure
about this try maintenance large C program

What is c++ runtime?

735

---

What is the use of pointer in c++ with example?

641

---

What are namespaces in c++?

695

---

Is eclipse good for c++?

621

---

How do you declare A pointer to function which receives an int pointer and returns a float pointer

775

---

---

What are guid?

792

---

What is iostream in c++ used for?

635

---

What are the advantages of early binding?

700

---

What is heap sort in c++?

707

---

Difference between overloading vs. Overriding

692

---

What are the advantages of using pointers in a program?

759

---

Is map ordered c++?

686

---

Why is c++ not purely object oriented?

669

---

What's the best free c++ profiler for windows?

716

---

What does floor mean in c++?

672

---