If we use only lookup transformation in a mapping ie,
SourceQualifier-->Lookup --> Target. , here datas are taking
very long time to load in target., so what are steps to
improve the performance in that mapping???????
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / hari
use order by clause in source qualifier.
Remove un necessary ports in that lookup.
try to restrict lookup cache based on the source data.
create order by clause in lookup override using the lookup
condition columns.
If lookup and source are in same database try to join in
source qualifier.
Drop the indiex on the target table before loading the data.
Check index on source table,
Check source table look tables are analysed properly or not.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 7 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / murali udayagiri
One more point we can add to the first answer.
i.e
Check lookup condition columns are having indexes or not.
If indexes are present check when those are rebuild.Index
snaps are old then rebuild them before going to be start
session.If indexes are not present on conditional columns
just create.
Please let me know if any issues.
Thanks,
Murali Udayagiri
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
What does cheating measurement mean?
supose if ur scr table contains alphanumeric values like 1,2,3,a,v,c in one columen like c1 n now u have load d data in 2 seperare columns like ID should contain only numbers 1,2,3 n NAME col should contain a,b,cin target?How
Is it possible to create multiple domains on a single Informatica server?
can any one explain me about junk dimension
What are the different ways to implement parallel processing in informatica?
Quickly characterize reusable change?
what is the difference between Informatica 7.1 and Abinitio?
Which transformation can be created only as reusable transformation but not as non-reusable transformation?
Why do flat file load is faster if you compare that with table load ? Please answer me. Advance Thanks, Manojkumar
There are 2 files, Master and User. We need to compare 2 files and prepare a output log file which lists out missing Rolename for each UserName between Master and User file. Please find the sample data- MASTER.csv ---------- Org|Tmp_UsrID|ShortMark|Rolename ---|---------|----------|------------ AUS|0_ABC_PW |ABC PW |ABC Admin PW AUS|0_ABC_PW |ABC PW |MT Deny all GBR|0_EDT_SEC|CR Edit |Editor GBR|0_EDT_SEC|CR Edit |SEC MT103 GBR|0_EDT_SEC|CR Edit |AB User USER.csv -------- Org|UserName|ShortMark|Rolename ---|--------|---------|------------ AUS|charls |ABC PW |ABC Admin PW AUS|amudha |ABC PW |MT Deny all GBR|sandya |CR Edit |Editor GBR|sandya |CR Edit |SEC MT103 GBR|sandya |CR Edit |AB User GBR|sarkar |CR Edit |Editor GBR|sarkar |CR Edit |SEC MT103 Required Output file: --------------------- Org|Tmp_UsrID|UserName|Rolename |Code ---|---------|--------|------------|-------- AUS|0_ABC_PW |charls |ABC Admin PW|MATCH AUS|0_ABC_PW |charls |MT Deny all |MISSING AUS|0_ABC_PW |amudha |ABC Admin PW|MISSING AUS|0_ABC_PW |amudha |MT Deny all |MATCH GBR|0_EDT_SEC|sandya |Editor |MATCH GBR|0_EDT_SEC|sandya |SEC MT103 |MATCH GBR|0_EDT_SEC|sandya |AB User |MATCH GBR|0_EDT_SEC|sarkar |Editor |MATCH GBR|0_EDT_SEC|sarkar |SEC MT103 |MATCH GBR|0_EDT_SEC|sarkar |AB User |MISSING Both the files are mapped through Organization, Shor_mark. So, based on each Organization, Short_Mark, for each UserName from User.csv, we need to find the Matching and Missing Rolename. I am able to bring Matching records in the output. But really I don't find any concept or logic to achieve "MISSING" records which are present in Master and not in User.csv for each UserName. Please help out guys. Let me know if you need any more information. Note:- In User.csv file, there are n number of Organization, under which n number Shortmark comes which has n number of UserName.
what is the end to end process meaning in my project(my project is development)and functionality plz tell me
Informatica settings are available in which file?