Which is more efficient - the external subroutine or a
copycode coded in to a NATURAL program? And Why?
- 2 Answers
- 13528 Views
- Hexaware, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / nitin
External subroutine is more efficient
1. It does not increase the size of object module of the
calling module
2. no need to compile all the calling modules after change
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 14 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Explain how many work file we can code in jcl?
Explain why do we use file-aid for seqential files?
What is the difference between escape(top or bottom) and escape immediate(top or bottom?
Explain difference between read(1) and read work file once?
In a Natural program i used the below code for report FORMAT LS=132 PS=60 And down the line I want to change either LS/PS like FORMAT LS=120 PS=50, is it possible? How it will work?
What is data trace system 2.0 used for?
How to receive data passed through jcl parm parameter in a natural program?
How converted the natural coding for adabas
How to create 1 ddm that fetches 3 adabas files simultaneously?
Can we see the copy book length using file-aid?
Tell me what type of files we can process thru file-aid?
What is a hyperdescriptor? How does it work?
What is the difference between read work file 1 and read work file once? Why we are using work file once?
Explain the data storage?
How to receive data passed through jcl parm parameter in a natural program? How data definition is defined in the program?
