Which is more efficient - the external subroutine or a
copycode coded in to a NATURAL program? And Why?
Answer Posted / nitin
External subroutine is more efficient
1. It does not increase the size of object module of the
calling module
2. no need to compile all the calling modules after change
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 14 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
How can we see the copy book length using file-aid?
Explain how many work file we can code in jcl?
Suppose you are processing an input file in a natural program and you want the program to fail if the file is empty. What command you use in natural to force it to fail?
Explain how to ftp the natural program to desktop? (From mainframe to pc), is it possible?
How converted the natural coding for adabas
Explain the data storage?
Explain difference between read(1) and read work file once?
Can you explain control variable in online screens?
Tell me what type of files we can process thru file-aid?
In a Natural program i used the below code for report FORMAT LS=132 PS=60 And down the line I want to change either LS/PS like FORMAT LS=120 PS=50, is it possible? How it will work?
Explain is it possible to code goto statement in natural? If yes please provide the syntax of the same?
Define cobol coding sheet?
How are you going to remove duplicates from the file that is being read?
Explain how to receive data passed through jcl parm parameter in a natural program? How data definition is defined in the program?
How to create 1 ddm that fetches 3 adabas files simultaneously?