Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
Which is more efficient - the external subroutine or a
copycode coded in to a NATURAL program? And Why?
- 2 Answers
- 13989 Views
- Hexaware, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / wing
Copy code is compiled into the program whereas a subprogram
must be called and potentialy passed parrameter.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / nitin
External subroutine is more efficient
1. It does not increase the size of object module of the
calling module
2. no need to compile all the calling modules after change
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 14 No |
What is the difference between read work file 1 and read work file once? Why we are using work file once?
In a Natural program i used the below code for report FORMAT LS=132 PS=60 And down the line I want to change either LS/PS like FORMAT LS=120 PS=50, is it possible? How it will work?
how we can find occurence of MU and PE fileds in a file?
The natural file converted to PDF file if Yes then explain ?
Types Of Read , FIND
Can we update with histogram?
How converted the natural coding for adabas
what is the difference between read and find ?
Explain why do we use file-aid for seqential files?
why do we use file-aid for seqential files?
Is it possible to code GOTO statement in NATURAL? if yes please provide the syntax of the same
Can we see the copy book length using file-aid?
COBOL 
