Which is more efficient - the external subroutine or a
copycode coded in to a NATURAL program? And Why?
- 2 Answers
- 12924 Views
- Hexaware, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / wing
Copy code is compiled into the program whereas a subprogram
must be called and potentialy passed parrameter.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / nitin
External subroutine is more efficient
1. It does not increase the size of object module of the
calling module
2. no need to compile all the calling modules after change
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 14 No |
Explain why do we use file-aid for seqential files?
How to receive data passed through jcl parm parameter in a natural program? How data definition is defined in the program?
Explain the data storage?
What is the difference between read work file 1 and read work file once? Why we are using work file once?
What is the difference between External subroutine and subprogram?
why do we use file-aid for seqential files?
A field declared as P8 needs to be redefined as Alphanumeric. What would be its new size?
The natural file converted to PDF file if Yes then explain ?
what type of files we can process thru file-aid
How to receive data passed through jcl parm parameter in a natural program?
Does Natural online require CICS or other TP systems to function? How does Natural interact with CICS? Thanks.
What is the quality process in development?
COBOL 
