Does automation replace manual testing?
- 2 Answers
- 3155 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / kingfisher
No, Always before going for automation testing all the
companies go for manual testing, and after fixing around
90% bugs they go for automation. till the time without
doing manual testing, automation testing is not allowed.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / sandeep
Manual testing is required as to getthe look and feel of the
product but yes 90% of manual effort and testing time can be
reduced by automation testing
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
what is client server application.
Discuss the economics of automation and the role of metrics in testing.
in my application i am getting different errors at same place. how i capture that errors using less code in qtp.
Tell me what are pros and cons of automating tests at ui layer?
Explain me what the webdriver supported mobile testing drivers do you know?
default time for executing 1000 lines of script in winrunner and also in qtp.
ihave one doubt in manual testing? what is the testing process
Explain me which web driver implementation is the fastest?
Does automation testing have any disadvantages?
Dear Friends, Please Let me know which is the open source software(Free of cost) to do cross browser Testing.
whether flash selenium supports to test Gaming application? like follows: identifying the images, dynamic animations, Dynamic value changes field and win conditions etcc..,
What is the major difference between Acceptance test , Functional test , Usability test and Performance test with special reference to auotomotive domain
WinRunner 
