Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built
by shah-jahan..... Is it true...........?

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback



Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built by shah-jahan..... Is it true............

Answer / vikram

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who
believes the
whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True
Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb
but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then
known as Tejo Mahalaya ) ... In the course of his research
Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by
Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his
own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an
exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken
from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of
Jaipur still
retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan
for
surrendering the Taj building. Using c aptured temples and
mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty
was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung
are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with
the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term ' Mahal ' has never
been used for a building in any Muslim countries from
Afghanisthan to Algeria . 'The unusual explanation that the
term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in
atleast two respects.

Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-
Zamani,' he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum'
from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for
the building.'Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of
Tejo Maha laya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak also says the
love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created
by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy
archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah
Jahan's time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj
Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated
to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example,
Prof . Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from
the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests
revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan.
European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra
in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes
the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no
reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of
Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of
Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy
building well before Shah Jahan's time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural
inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal
being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many
rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah
Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public ...
Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva
and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in
Hindu temples .... Fearing political backlash, Indira
Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book
withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian
publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is
only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research.

The current government should open the sealed rooms of the
Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international
experts investigate.

Is This Answer Correct ?    9 Yes 1 No

Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built by shah-jahan..... Is it true............

Answer / sundar

Definitely. it was built by large group of carpenters,
labourers and others. Shah-JAHAN is like the program
managem and he only supervised the effort.

Is This Answer Correct ?    11 Yes 4 No

Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built by shah-jahan..... Is it true............

Answer / vikram

BY BBC source its not a tomb it is a ancient temple of lord
shiva and have name that i can't remember it.it bulit by
some indian king and laterly modify by mughal emperor.there
is some kind design in there just see the top of all
pillers there is old temple creatures..hidden OM in floral
design.

i get a mail from some of my friends.there is picture and
much more about it.i can't post here these picutres...
but when i first read it i just shocked...

Is This Answer Correct ?    10 Yes 3 No

Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built by shah-jahan..... Is it true............

Answer / guest

true

Is This Answer Correct ?    8 Yes 4 No

Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built by shah-jahan..... Is it true............

Answer / indramani

shah-jahan invested money & efforts for build taj mahal.
it mean he is the owner of the taj mahal.
so ovisouly it was builted by himself.
so its not true.......

Is This Answer Correct ?    6 Yes 4 No

Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built by shah-jahan..... Is it true............

Answer / shah-jahan

Shah and jahan are two diff persons having common wife &
for her they wasted 128 bugs to built tajmahal,updated news
is it is for sale now hurry if u make ur registration now u
will get 100% discount & gift of rs 128 absolutely free!
free!!

Is This Answer Correct ?    3 Yes 3 No

Nowadays there is a discussion that tajmahal was not built by shah-jahan..... Is it true............

Answer / anup

Taj Mahal was not built by Shah Jahan. It was built by the
native Emperors of India named Rajputs. Taj Mahal was
previously known as Tejo Mahalay and was a great temple in
the name of Lord Shiva. The story was interpreted by the
Islamic Invaders of India. Many other temples where
destroyed and where converted into Mosques. In India there
are no architecture that has been built by the Islam
rulers. The corrupted Indian Govt is being looting the
entire country and is fooling the entire world by calling
this building as a symbol of Love. Rather its a symbol of
Islamic destruction in India and the world.
Source(s):
Taj Mahal: An Epic Manipulated (Part-1)
http://desertrosepost.blogspot.com/2011/05/taj-mahal-epic-
manipulated.html

Taj Mahal: An Epic Manipulated (Part-2)
http://desertrosepost.blogspot.com/2011/05/taj-mahal-epic-
manipulated-part-2.html

Taj Mahal: An Epic Manipulated (Part-3)
http://desertrosepost.blogspot.com/2011/05/taj-mahal-epic-
manipulated-part-3.html

Is This Answer Correct ?    2 Yes 3 No

Post New Answer

More Scripts Errors Interview Questions

how to upload asset master data through LSMW in sap fi?

2 Answers   AppLabs,


My question is in FLASH I will take 10 or 5 questions and last I will give my username and password and also I will give score to the answers which user submitted and that too the score and details of of the user should come in separate file, this entire thing should be done in Flash only. Is it possibe?

0 Answers  


Sir, I apply sbi clerk exams(07/09/09)But I did a mistake to enter my date of birth(correct 04.01.1985 / wrong 04.01.1984).please give me suggestions please. Thanking you, Bhushan.B

0 Answers  


Account GOLD-100200 not allowed to be defined as reconciliation account Message no. AC309 Diagnosis Account 100200 is defined as a reconciliation account for fixed assets for chart of accounts GOLD and account determination 11000. This is not correct in the circumstances (Accumulated depreciation account for ordinary depr). Keep in mind that the Customizing definition of the given depreciation area also influences the consistency check of the G/L accounts. This is particularly true for the posting settings in the depreciation area, if the accounts are value adjustment (depreciation) accounts. Procedure Change the account definition, or assign a different account. ERROR MESSAGE “Account INT-160600 not allowed to be defined as reconciliation account” . Message No.: AC309 ANALYSIS The above error message occured when saving the configuration changes in “Acquisition from affiliated company” through config transaction AO90. Here’s the configuration path that prompted the error: Path: IMG → Financial Accounting → Asset Accounting → Integration with the General Ledger → Assign G/L Accounts. Transaction Code: AO90 G/L account 160600 is entered in the highlighted “Acquisition from affiliated company” field. Upon saving the configuration change, the above error messageprompted. Do note that g/l account 160600 has been defined as reconciliation account type for asset. Here’s how it is set- up. SYSTEM DIAGNOSIS Account 160600 is defined as a reconciliation account for fixed assets for chart of accounts BPPH and account determination 1000. This is not correct in the circumstances (Clearing acct: Acquisition from affiliated company). Keep in mind that the Customizing defination of the given depreciation area also influences the consistency check of the G/L accounts. This is particularly true for the posting settings in the depreciation area, if the accounts are value adjustment (depreciation) accounts. SOLUTION & PROCEDURE If the g/l account entered is correct change the settings of g/l account 160600. Do not set it as reconciliation account, just leave the reconciliation account type blank. Otherwise, create a new g/l account that will be used as intercompany transfer clearing account. The new g/l account should not be set as reconciliation account. You must be logged in to post a comment. • F Asset accounting account determination natandycanada asked Sep 3, 2009 | Replies (5) Hello I am building the asset accounting account determination. When i enter the GL account for Account determination i get the message: reconciliation account is not allowed!!! (. SAP message AC309 )has anyone come across this message? I checked the depreciation area definition and all should be good. I am on ECC6. Thank you Join this group Popular White Paper On This Topic • 2011 ERP (Enterprise Resources Planning) Comparison Guide 5 Replies 1 Anuj Purwar replied Sep 4, 2009 Hi, Assign a P&L account for depreciation posting. Thanks. _____ 1 natandycanada replied Sep 4, 2009 I do have a P&L account Andy Maoulaoui 0 Ron Roberts replied Sep 4, 2009 Help us ouot with a little more detail. What G/L account are you trying top assign? Depreciation expense? Asset account? Accumulated depreciation account? Gain/loss on disposal P&L account? Other? 1 natandycanada replied Sep 5, 2009 I am assigning an accumulated depreciation account. this account is naturally a reconciliation account. all other accounts can be entered without any error. When i enter the accum depreciation account in depr area 01 (post to legder 0L) the system give the message that reconciliation account is not allowed. when i enter the accum dep account in dep area 02 ( posting to non leading ledger) i dont get the error. Andy Maoulaoui White Papers and Webcasts Popular • The Evolution of ERP and What it Means for Business Related • Gain IT asset visibility, control and automation • SMB Accounting SaaS Comparison Guide • Shifting the B2B Marketing Paradigm from Contacts to People: ... More White Papers 0 Gearoid Pierse replied Dec 4, 2009 Hi everyone - I am getting the same problem when putting in an accumumated depreciation account in the customizing for depreciation area 01, I get *** (message AC309 "Account 1100250 is defined as a reconciliation account for fixed assets for chart of accounts OPER and account determination AD400. This is not correct in the circumstances (Accumulated depreciation account for ordinary depr).Keep in mind that the Customizing definition of the given depreciation area also influences the consistency check of the G/L accounts. This is particularly true for the posting settings in the depreciation area, if the accounts are value adjustment (depreciation) accounts. *** However, I can assign my accumulated depreciation account 1100250 (which has the recon account "A" (assets) setting no problem for depreciation area 20. If I take away the recon account setting in the G/L account I get a different error message

0 Answers  


when i open the system error dialog box come memory could not be read some.

0 Answers  






Hi can any one help me below two steps in sap FICO, 1.Create document number ranges for company code. 2.Copy document number ranges to fiscal year. was trying to do it but i am not able to completing successfully,

0 Answers  


When I look for mannual enry of any of the command in Unix, such as #man ls, I get a message "Reformatting entry. Wait..." and control comes to a next command prompt. what is the problem?

0 Answers  


osgelvaitre arrange it which make 1 romantic word

1 Answers  


WHAT IS A VECTOR ? HOW IS DIFFER FORM AN ARRAY

0 Answers  


pleasesend which type of the books to indian banks clerks& what is topics pleases mailme

0 Answers  


If u look at the mirror image of a clock & the time showing is 2:07 what is the angel between the hour hand & minute hand ? Is it possitive or negative?

4 Answers  


how to fix the heap space error in java ?

1 Answers  


Categories