Shall we use 'free' to free memory assigned by new, What are
the further consequences??
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / aruna kumar samal
yes you can use free to free memory assignrd by new but it
wo not call the destructor.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 6 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / uma sankar pradhan
No,we shouldnot use 'free' to free memory assigned by new.
It causes memory leak and sometimes hanging of the system
Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / nishikant sahu
Yes you can but not recommend, b'c some time when you class
hold the heap memory it can't be free by "Free" b'c of no
constructor call happening via "Free" and you get the memory
leak. so use New/ delete or malloc/free pair.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / guest
Yes we can use free which was assigned by new.but in this
case no destrctor will be called as free doesn't call this.
So it is recommended that we should not use free if we
allcoate the memory using new.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / krishnarao panchadi
Syntactically we can use "free" in place of "delete". But
semantically it is senseless as it wont call the destructor.
Note that, deallocating is not the only purpose of
using "delete". The destructor should also be called if you
call the constructor(while creating the object).
Failing to call "delete" may lead to system crash.
Using "free" wont call the desturctor.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
What is the difference between delegation and implemented-in-terms-of?
Where are setjmp and longjmp used in c++?
What are register variables?
Snake Game: This is normal snake game which you can find in most of the mobiles. You can develop it in Java, C/C++, C# or what ever language you know.
What are the data types in c++?
What is else if syntax?
Define a nested class.
Is c++ proprietary?
Can we change the basic meaning of an operator in c++?
What is the C-style character string?
Is there any function that can skip certain number of characters present in the input stream?
is throwing exception from a constructor not a good practice ?