why interfaces are faster than abstract classes?
- 4 Answers
- 19352 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / aruna raman
Actually abstract are faster than interfaces classes.
interfaces are Slow, requires extra indirection to find the
corresponding method in the actual class. Modern JVM's are
discovering ways to reduce this speed penalty.
Abstract Class ::
- It cannot defines all the methods
- It has subclass.
- Here, Subclass is useless
- A class can be extend an abstract class
Interface ::
- It defines all the methods
- It must have implementations by other classes, But there
will be no use of that.
- Only an interface can extend another interface.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 16 Yes | 3 No |
Answer / laxmikant
As Interfaces always have abstract methods, it needs less
time for compiler to compile them as compared to abstract
classes which may have well defined methods for sharing
among the classes which will extend it.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 16 No |
Answer / m gangadhar
using interfaces over abstract classes is gives better
ferformance becoz interfaces does not have any constructor
but abstract classes can have. for this reason it does not
vaste time to create object.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 11 Yes | 29 No |
What is an argument in java?
In how many ways we can create threads in java?
Define "Access specifiers" in java.
How can two threads be made to communicate with each other?
how many ways to create Thread and which one is good? runnable interface ot Thread class?
Which is better arraylist or vector?
What is the primitive type short?
Is java se open source?
Which java.util classes and interfaces support event handling?
What are the types of classes in java?
Can we compare two strings in java?
What is parsing in grammar?
Core Java 
