Difference between .NET components and COM components?
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / virat
Com component needs registeration and .Net component
doesn't require it.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shanker
.NET applications are managed by .NET Runtime so it is
useful for memory management,security,caching,versioning)
and so it is said as Managed.But COM Components are said as
Unmanaged.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / abhishek maitrey
COM was not designed to be extensible whereas .Net
component are run within COM+ applications so no COM
callable wrapper is required. Hence it runs as a .Net
component.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 3 No |
Explain transaction atomicity?
Optimization technique description ?
Is com+ dead?
Explain queued components?
What is jit activation?
What is ccw?
Explain the use of contextutil class?
Explain role-based security?
Can .NET Framework components use the features of Component Services?
What are CCW and RCW?
What is transaction atomicity?
What happens when we instantiate a COM component ?
Visual Basic (800)
C Sharp (3816)
ASP.NET (3180)
VB.NET (461)
COM+ (79)
ADO.NET (717)
IIS (369)
MTS (11)
Crystal Reports (81)
BizTalk (89)
Dot Net (2435)
Exchange Server (362)
SharePoint (720)
WCF (340)
MS Office Microsoft (6963)
LINQ Language-Integrated Query (317)
WPF (371)
TypeScript (144)
Microsoft Related AllOther (311)