Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
Difference between .NET components and COM components?
- 3 Answers
- 8555 Views
- Microsoft, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / virat
Com component needs registeration and .Net component
doesn't require it.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shanker
.NET applications are managed by .NET Runtime so it is
useful for memory management,security,caching,versioning)
and so it is said as Managed.But COM Components are said as
Unmanaged.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / abhishek maitrey
COM was not designed to be extensible whereas .Net
component are run within COM+ applications so no COM
callable wrapper is required. Hence it runs as a .Net
component.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 3 No |
What is the new three features of COM+ services, which are not there in COM (MTS) ?
WHY WE LEARN THE 8085 ? BECAUSE WE R IN 21 CENTURI SO WHY WE LEARN 8085?
What are rcw?
What is durability?
Explain consistency?
Define availability?
Is it true that COM objects no longer need to be registered on the server?
Explain role-based security?
What is jit activation?
What is the new three features of COM+ services, which are not there in COM (MTS)
What is Pinvoke?
What is integrity?
-
Visual Basic (800) - C Sharp (3816)
- ASP.NET (3180)
- VB.NET (461)
- COM+ (79)
- ADO.NET (717)
- IIS (369)
- MTS (11)
- Crystal Reports (81)
- BizTalk (89)
- Dot Net (2435)
- Exchange Server (362)
- SharePoint (720)
- WCF (340)
- MS Office Microsoft (6963)
- LINQ Language-Integrated Query (317)
- WPF (371)
- TypeScript (144)
- Microsoft Related AllOther (311)
