Difference between .NET components and COM components?
- 3 Answers
- 7666 Views
- Microsoft, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / virat
Com component needs registeration and .Net component
doesn't require it.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shanker
.NET applications are managed by .NET Runtime so it is
useful for memory management,security,caching,versioning)
and so it is said as Managed.But COM Components are said as
Unmanaged.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / abhishek maitrey
COM was not designed to be extensible whereas .Net
component are run within COM+ applications so no COM
callable wrapper is required. Hence it runs as a .Net
component.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 3 No |
Explain integrity ?
Which namespace do the classes, allowing you to support COM functionality, are located?
Explain how to register dll in com / com+ application?
What is the new three features of COM+ services, which are not there in COM (MTS) ?
Define integrity?
How will you register com+ services?
Define manageability?
What is scalability?
what are wrapper Classes?
Is the com architecture same as .net architecture?
Explain consistency?
Explain loosely coupled events?
-
Visual Basic (800) - C Sharp (3816)
- ASP.NET (3180)
- VB.NET (461)
- COM+ (79)
- ADO.NET (717)
- IIS (369)
- MTS (11)
- Crystal Reports (81)
- BizTalk (89)
- Dot Net (2435)
- Exchange Server (362)
- SharePoint (720)
- WCF (340)
- MS Office Microsoft (6963)
- LINQ Language-Integrated Query (317)
- WPF (371)
- TypeScript (144)
- Microsoft Related AllOther (311)
