Difference between .NET components and COM components?
- 3 Answers
- 7630 Views
- Microsoft, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / virat
Com component needs registeration and .Net component
doesn't require it.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 0 No |
Answer / shanker
.NET applications are managed by .NET Runtime so it is
useful for memory management,security,caching,versioning)
and so it is said as Managed.But COM Components are said as
Unmanaged.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 1 No |
Answer / abhishek maitrey
COM was not designed to be extensible whereas .Net
component are run within COM+ applications so no COM
callable wrapper is required. Hence it runs as a .Net
component.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 3 No |
Disadvantages of COM components?
Explain durability?
What is the difference between com architecture and .net architecture?
What is ccw?
Define manageability?
Is the COM architecture same as .Net architecture? What is the difference between them?
Define availability?
What is COM?
Explain loosely coupled events?
how to register dll in COM / COM+ application
How CCW and RCW is working?
Explain role-based security?
-
Visual Basic (800) - C Sharp (3816)
- ASP.NET (3180)
- VB.NET (461)
- COM+ (79)
- ADO.NET (717)
- IIS (369)
- MTS (11)
- Crystal Reports (81)
- BizTalk (89)
- Dot Net (2435)
- Exchange Server (362)
- SharePoint (720)
- WCF (340)
- MS Office Microsoft (6963)
- LINQ Language-Integrated Query (317)
- WPF (371)
- TypeScript (144)
- Microsoft Related AllOther (311)
