How or for what purpose look up transformation would be
useful in Sales or Banking Project?
Please reply!
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / raj
For maintaining the complete history we need to look up on
the target table especially in sales and banking projects we
use SCD2 type mappings for maintain the complete history.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
Thankd for your reply.
Could you please explain me about transaction code?
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
My i/p is like below 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10....100 I want that to be populated in two o/p as below o/p-1: 10,20,30,40,50,60,70,90... o/p-2: 11,21,31,41,51,61,71,81,91.... How to do it in ingotmatica...
How we will implement Pushdown Optimization and Types in Informatica with better examples
If the records doesnt satisfy the filter condition where will it go?
What are the new features of informatica 7.1?
Hi If i had source like unique & duplicate records like 1,1,2,3,3,4 then i want load unique records in one target like 2,4 and i want load duplicate records like 1,1,3,3 then can any body please send me what is th scnario. my mail i shek.inform@gmail.com
Hi Experts , Can you please help me regarding the below question How to remove first three rows and last three rows in informatica.. thanks and regards Natraj
How can the following be achieved in 1 single Informatica Mapping. * If the Header table record has error value(NULL) then those records and the corresponding child records in the SUBHEAD and DETAIL tables should also not be loaded into the target(TARGET1,TARGET 2 or TARGET3). * If the HEADER table record is valid, but the SUBHEAD or DETAIL table record has an error value (NULL) then the no data should be loaded into the target TARGET1,TARGET 2 or TARGET3. * If the HEADER table record is valid and the SUBHEAD or DETAIL table record also has valid records only then the data should be loaded into the target TARGET1,TARGET 2 and TARGET3. =================================================== HEADER COL1 COL2 COL3 COL5 COL6 1 ABC NULL NULL CITY1 2 XYZ 456 TUBE CITY2 3 GTD 564 PIN CITY3 SUBHEAD COL1 COL2 COL3 COL5 COL6 1 1001 VAL3 748 543 1 1002 VAL4 33 22 1 1003 VAL6 23 11 2 2001 AAP1 334 443 2 2002 AAP2 44 22 3 3001 RAD2 NULL 33 3 3002 RAD3 NULL 234 3 3003 RAD4 83 31 DETAIL COL1 COL2 COL3 COL5 COL6 1 D001 TXX2 748 543 1 D002 TXX3 33 22 1 D003 TXX4 23 11 2 D001 PXX2 56 224 2 D002 PXX3 666 332 ======================================================== TARGET1 2 XYZ 456 TUBE CITY2 TARGET2 2 2001 AAP1 334 443 2 2002 AAP2 44 22 TARGET3 2 D001 PXX2 56 224 2 D002 PXX3 666 332
performance wise which one is better in joiner and lookup transformation?why?explain clearly?
i had a source containing business,sales,details column and i have to load it to a target but i have some bad records in it , but i have to load 70% of business records and 50% of sales and 95% of details records excluding bad records to achieve this what should be done and what all logic and tx should be used can anyone help? thanks in advance
Suppose we have a source qualifier transformation that populates two target tables. How do you ensure tgt2 is loaded after tgt1?
Explain the flow of data in Iinformatica?
Can you use flat files in Mapplets.