Is it possible that a nucleus has negative mass defect?
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / p k rana
Mass defect is positive means nucleons spent some mass which use to bind the nucleons. Hence nucleons are bound due to positive mass defect. but if mass defect is negative then nucleons will not be bound.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 10 Yes | 5 No |
Answer / muhammad nasir khan
~The mass defect can be negative....and it means if the mass
defect is negative we will have to give the external energy
to break the nucleus into nucleons
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 18 Yes | 16 No |
Answer / saima
this is not possible.because if mass defect is negative then its mean that mass of the nucleolus is less then the nucleus.which is not possible.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 12 Yes | 19 No |
If the nucleus has had a mass defect it is likely that the
strong force and the weak force have sustained a major
reduction in equilibrium. This can cause the positive and
negative charges to reverse and change energy levels. Such
a phenomenon has been describe by Einstein in his paper on
the speed of light and time reduction. You can check this
with the use of an electron microscope to determine is the
color spectrum had changed drastically. If so, then you may
have a problem.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 12 No |
give a brief description of spintronics in 5 minutes?
What is the rest mass energy of an electron?
What does held nucleons together in a nucleus?
What is the essential difference between an electron and a beta ray?
Cadmium rods are provided in a nuclear reactor.Why?
THe atomic masses are generally not whole numbers. Why?
Tell me how asteroids are formed?
Explain history of nuclear reaction?
Why is heavy water used as a moderator?
2. The velocity of a body was noted to be constant during five minutes of its motion. What was acceleration during this interval its?
3 Answers Atomic Energy Commission,
What is Fission and Fusion?
would know if the magnetic moment of 4He has been measured experimentally. Indeed, while 3He is given in the Rhagavan table, there is no mention of 4He. Of course it is theoretically zero but has this been verified by an EXPERIMENT?