Why we need new operator in java at the time of object
declaration and why not in c++?



Why we need new operator in java at the time of object declaration and why not in c++?..

Answer / anuja joshi

The major difference between Java and C++ is the behavior of object variables. In C++, object variables hold values, not object references. Note that the new operator is never used when constructing objects in C++. You simply supply the construction parameters after the variable name.

Point p(1, 2); /* construct p */

If you do not supply construction parameters, then the object is constructed with the default constructor.

Time now; /* construct now with Time::Time() */

This is very different from Java. In Java, this command would merely create an uninitialized reference. In C++, it constructs an actual object.

Is This Answer Correct ?    3 Yes 0 No

Post New Answer

More Programming Languages AllOther Interview Questions

what is fisrt female program

1 Answers  


why we use abstract in awt?

0 Answers  


Tips for blog integration by www.esteemwebsolutions.com. Can Any body suggest me to how to make wonderful questions on web integration..

0 Answers  


what is woransient key word? how it is used in java

0 Answers   Convergys,


class A{ void me(){s.o.p("");} class B extends A{ void me() {s.o.p(" ");} class M{ A a=new B(); B b=new A(); a.me(); b.mne();} what is the output of this, how?

2 Answers   Cosmos, HyTech Pro, WinSoft,






What is autocall macro and how to create autocall macro? what is the use of it?

0 Answers   GE,


How many forms can you create in a Visual Basic 6 Standard EXE project? Is there any limit on that?

0 Answers  


Difference of Console, web & windows applications?

0 Answers  


I'm trying to solve this. But I'm not figuring the right solution. Can some one help what the answer is for the question below? You can use as many variables as you need, there are no negative numbers, all numbers are integers. You do not know the size of the integers, they could be infinitely large, so you can't count on truncating at any point. There are NO comparisons allowed, no if statements or anything like that. There are only four operations you can do on a variable. 1) You can set a variable to 0. 2) You can set a variable = another variable. 3) You can increment a variable (only by 1), and it's a post increment. 4) You can loop. So, if you were to say loop(v1) and v1 = 10, your loop would execute 10 times, but the value in v1 wouldn't change so the first line in the loop can change value of v1 without changing the number of times you loop. You need to do 3 things. 1) Write a function that decrements by 1. 2) Write a function that subtracts one variable from another. 3) Write a function that divides one variable by another. 4) See if you can implement all 3 using at most 4 variables. Meaning, you're not making function calls now, you're making macros. And at most you can have 4 variables. The restriction really only applies to divide, the other 2 are easy to do with 4 vars or less. Division on the other hand is dependent on the other 2 functions, so, if subtract requires 3 variables, then divide only has 1 variable left unchanged after a call to subtract. Basically, just make your function calls to decrement and subtract so you pass your vars in by reference, and you can't declare any new variables in a function, what you pass in is all it gets.

1 Answers   Microsoft,


how do i add a column dynamically in a table by using java application?

0 Answers  


3. What is the difference between testing and Quality Assurance?

0 Answers  


is possible to delete specific data in a row by using of sql query?

0 Answers   HCL,


Categories