Teradata (490)
Business Objects (875)
Cognos (1143)
Informatica (2428)
Crystal Enterprise Suite (30)
Actuate (46)
Ab Initio (442)
Data Stage (917)
SAS (1049)
Micro Strategy (282)
ETL (315)
OBIEE (92)
IBM Cognos TM1 (55)
Amazon Redshift (62)
Data Warehouse General (749) If the PMON is not working then how do you identify and monitor all the processes, resources and sessions ?
Can you define confirmed dimension?
define galaxy repository in informatica
Can microstrategy intelligence server scale easily and cost effectively based on my growing needs?
What is data cleaning?
What information is shared by the application across microstrategy web nodes?
What Is The Difference Between Oltp And Olap?
Plz can any one say me how to get the informatica certification materials and dumps
List the logical and conditional operators that are used with teradata along with their meanings?
What are the difference between the sas data step and sas procs?
Explain about enterprise scalability and roi of data integration suite?
How do you improve the performance of the Cognos Analytics report
Hello, I have PROC SQLs results group by 3 fields and I use SUM and COUNT functions in SQL. The problem is when I try to display my result with PROC TABULATE. I am getting very big numbers. I believe I make a mistake some where in Tabulate. Here is my Proc Tabulate. PROC TABULATE DATA=OUT04_05 FORMAT=12.; CLASS YR CENTRE VISA / PRELOADFMT EXCLUSIVE; VAR NEWUSER FRAUD TRANSFER AUTUSER REISSUE; TABLE CENTRE ALL, (YR ALL)*VISA, (NEWUSER*F=COMMA12. AUTUSER*F=COMMA12. FRAUD*F=COMMA12. TRANSFER*F=COMMA12. REISSUE*F=COMMA12.) / MISSTEXT={LABEL='0'} PRINTMISS RTS=20; FORMAT VISA VISAFMT.; KEYLABEL SUM = ' ' ALL = 'TOTAL'; LABEL YR = 'DATE YEAR' NEWUSER = 'TOTAL NEW ACCT' TRANSFER = 'TOTAL TRANSFER' FRAUD = 'TOTAL FRAUD TRANSFER' AUTUSER = 'TOTAL AUTH USERS' REISSUE = 'TOTAL REISSUE'; When I code it like : NEWUSER*N*F=COMMA12. AUTUSER*N*F=COMMA12. I get same amount numbers but to find a NEWUSER I use COUNT(*) and to find AUTUSER I use SUM(xxxx) function so both result shouldn’t be the same my problem is in this point. Could you tell me where the problem in code is. How can I display my result? TX.
Why can't we connect source qualifier and aggrigator transformation to an expression ? Why they resticted to conncet 2 active trasformations to an passive transformation ?
What do you understand by the term 'model durability'?