SQL*Loader-00653: XML data set to NULL in column string, row
number, table string
- 1 Answers
- 2290 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / guest
Cause: Encountered errors (e.g. parsing errors in LOBFILE)
while loading LOBs into an XML column. The row will remain
in the table and its XML column will be initialized to null.
Loading of other records will continue.
Action: Correct the data file (see accompanying messages)
and reload.
Please add more information about this Error
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
IMG-02003: 2FF03 - incorrect color histogram feature specification
RMAN-05017: no copy of datafile number found to recover
IMP-00096: Warning: Skipping table "string"."string" because type synonym "string"."string" cannot be created
ORA-26028: index string.string initially in unusable state
ORA-07497: sdpri: cannot create trace file 'string'; errno = string.
ORA-26029: index string.string partition string initially in unusable state
when i ran any workflow or session, getting below error: seesion task instance[s_xxx]: Execution terminated unexpecterdly
ORA-26095: unprocessed stream data exists
How to resolve QSM-01108 error. I have no OR conditions in my query, but do have 9 IN conditions. The error says the max limit is 2 while I have 257 number of disjuncts. However, if I remove even a single IN condition, the query is rewritten. I cannot change my query. How can I resolve this issue?
NZE-28868: Peer certificate chain check failed.
ORA-16516: The current state is invalid for the attempted operation.
ORA-26082: load of overlapping segments on table string.string is not allowed
ORA-16626: failed to enable specified object
ORA-26030: index string.string had string partitions made unusable due to:
[ERROR] [main 11:01:20] (JCLLoggerAdapter.java:error:454) Unsuccessful: alter table user.CEN_USER_MASTER add constraint FKF4EDEDC3D0BAAE75 foreign key (ROLE_ID) references user.CEN_ROLE_MASTER [ERROR] [main 11:01:20] (JCLLoggerAdapter.java:error:454) ORA-02275: such a referential constraint already exists in the table
