Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
QSM-01125: a more optimal set operator materialized view
than string was used to rewrite
- 1 Answers
- 2781 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / guest
Cause: Query Rewrite always chooses the most optimal set
operator materialized view based on parameters, such as
cardinality of the set operator materialized view, number of
branches that the set operator materialized view can rewrite
etc. The set operator materialized view specified was found
to be less optimal.
Action: To force using a set operator materialized view,
consider using a rewrite hint.
Please add more information about this Error
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
IMP-00064: Definition of LOB was truncated by export
ORA-26030: index string.string had string partitions made unusable due to:
RMAN-05017: no copy of datafile number found to recover
ORA-26084: direct path context already finished
In my project I am using star schema and only diimension tables are loaded and not fact tables any one can help me why it is happening? Plase guide me.
ORA-26079: file "string" is not part of table string.string
IMP-00096: Warning: Skipping table "string"."string" because type synonym "string"."string" cannot be created
ORA-26029: index string.string partition string initially in unusable state
ORA-07497: sdpri: cannot create trace file 'string'; errno = string.
ORA-16516: The current state is invalid for the attempted operation.
ORA-16627: No standby databases support the overall protection mode.
when i ran any workflow or session, getting below error: seesion task instance[s_xxx]: Execution terminated unexpecterdly
How to resolve QSM-01108 error. I have no OR conditions in my query, but do have 9 IN conditions. The error says the max limit is 2 while I have 257 number of disjuncts. However, if I remove even a single IN condition, the query is rewritten. I cannot change my query. How can I resolve this issue?
if the lengths of two wires are same and the area of cross sections is 4:7 then what will be the ratio of current passing through these wires
IMP-00060: Warning: Skipping table "string"."string" because object type "string"."string" does not exist or has different identifier
