Golgappa.net | Golgappa.org | BagIndia.net | BodyIndia.Com | CabIndia.net | CarsBikes.net | CarsBikes.org | CashIndia.net | ConsumerIndia.net | CookingIndia.net | DataIndia.net | DealIndia.net | EmailIndia.net | FirstTablet.com | FirstTourist.com | ForsaleIndia.net | IndiaBody.Com | IndiaCab.net | IndiaCash.net | IndiaModel.net | KidForum.net | OfficeIndia.net | PaysIndia.com | RestaurantIndia.net | RestaurantsIndia.net | SaleForum.net | SellForum.net | SoldIndia.com | StarIndia.net | TomatoCab.com | TomatoCabs.com | TownIndia.com
Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...

PLS-00251: RETURN, for actual function return, must be last
in the parameters clause

Answer Posted / guest

Cause: RETURN specification for the actual function return,
used within the parameters clause must hold the very last
position. Example : The following will give this error since
the RETURN specification for the actual function return in
the parameters clause is not the last. FUNCTION
myexternalfunc (var1 BINARY_INTEGER, var2 BINARY_INTEGER)
RETURN BINARY_INTEGER IS EXTERNAL NAME "myexternalfunc"
LIBRARY somelib PARAMETERS (var1 LONG, var2 SHORT, RETURN
INT, RETURN INDICATOR SHORT); The correct syntax is the
following. Note that RETURN for actual function return is
the last specification in the parameters clause. FUNCTION
myexternalfunc (var1 BINARY_INTEGER, var2 BINARY_INTEGER)
RETURN BINARY_INTEGER IS EXTERNAL NAME "myexternalfunc"
LIBRARY somelib PARAMETERS (var1 LONG, var2 SHORT, RETURN
INDICATOR SHORT, RETURN INT);

Action: Correct the syntax of the RETURN specification in
the parameters clause

Please add more information about this Error

Is This Answer Correct ?    0 Yes 0 No



Post New Answer       View All Answers


Please Help Members By Posting Answers For Below Questions

IMP-00070: Lob definitions in dump file are inconsistent with database.

1739


ORA-26095: unprocessed stream data exists

3556


NZE-28868: Peer certificate chain check failed.

2794


How to resolve QSM-01108 error. I have no OR conditions in my query, but do have 9 IN conditions. The error says the max limit is 2 while I have 257 number of disjuncts. However, if I remove even a single IN condition, the query is rewritten. I cannot change my query. How can I resolve this issue?

2715


Hi guys, I have four tables those are emp,dept,eliminate and uneliminate. i wrote small cursor..when i run, it display one error (ORA-01403 nodata found)... The query is: Declare cursor c1 is select e.ename emp_name from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno group by deptno; r1 c1%rowtype; test_emp varchar2(200); begin for r1 in c1 loop begin select eliminate_emp into test_emp from eliminate t,uneliminate ut where t.number=ut.number and t.deptno=e.deptno and rownum<1; end; dbms_output.put_line(r1.emp_name); end loop; end; Thanks...

2588


if the lengths of two wires are same and the area of cross sections is 4:7 then what will be the ratio of current passing through these wires

2690


In my project I am using star schema and only diimension tables are loaded and not fact tables any one can help me why it is happening? Plase guide me.

2866


RMAN-05017: no copy of datafile number found to recover

2408


ORA-26029: index string.string partition string initially in unusable state

2146


IMP-00096: Warning: Skipping table "string"."string" because type synonym "string"."string" cannot be created

1614


IMP-00063: Warning: Skipping table "string"."string" because object type "string"."string" cannot be created or has different identifier

2722


ORA-26032: index string.string loading aborted after string keys

2099


IMP-00060: Warning: Skipping table "string"."string" because object type "string"."string" does not exist or has different identifier

3145


ORA-26084: direct path context already finished

1942


ORA-26028: index string.string initially in unusable state

3852