Can Java be said to be the complete object-oriented programming language
- 1 Answers
- 352 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / nashiinformaticssolutions
No, Java cannot be treated as a complete object-oriented programming language.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What is java command?
What is the list interface?
Can interface be private in java?
Is java a virus?
Can we return null in java?
Is it possible for yielded thread to get chance for its execution again ?
What is the role of the java.rmi.naming class?
Which collection is best for sorting in java?
Can we override the static method?
Say you want to store the information about a number of pets in an array. Typical information that you could store for each pet (where relevant) would be • Breed of animal • Animal's name • Its birth date • Its sex • Whether it has been sterilised or not • When it is due for its next inoculation • When it last had its wings clipped For each type of pet (eg. dog, cat or bird) you would typically define a class to hold the relevant data. Note: You do not need to implement these classes. Just answer the following questions. 3.1.1 What would be the advantage of creating a superclass (eg. Pet) and declaring an array of Pet objects over simply using an array of Objects, storing each of the instances of the different pet classes (eg. Dog, Cat or Bird) in it? 3.1.2 Would you define Pet as a class or as an interface? Why? (2) (2)
Why java is considered as platform independent?
Can we have more than one package statement in the source file?
What is linkedlist in java?
If a class is declared without any access modifiers, where can the class be accessed?
What is java english?
