Answer Posted / k k nayak

Kalinga war is imposed history. falsified to defame and break the moral of kalingan. many similarity are there in british document. there was no King? then how the empire was there. refer to the sheela lekhas of dhauli, junagarh etc. why ashok accepted budhism for the sake of AHINSHA when he was jain. you will never find same case a wining king accepting the religion of a defeated king. he became the diciple of Budha? which budha? budha is not a person its race/position. what was the tenure of ashok and and where was his state and capital? how the kalinga tatoo, tiget cave and elephant cave exists even today at indonesia? why khandagiri and dhauli silent about ashok? i know its not easy to digest as we are digesting something else since last 2 generations or more. but time has come to redefine our history. for that we need to do the research from mahabharat age, not from the british document. ODIA is a SASTRIYA/classic language, that means the existance is from mahabharat age. the name is there who faught mahabharat war from kalinga. then why there is a disput of kalinga war. its all cut and paste....i know no 1 gonna accept it but need to think.

No New Questions to Answer in this Category !!    You can

Post New Questions

Answer Questions in Different Category