Why might full image copies be faster to implement than an
incremental image copy?
Answer Posted / mahesh vasudevan
It all depends on the size of the tablespace. Full image
copy gives us full recovery consitent state. In case of
Incremental image copy the page needs to be checked against
the condition provided for incremental image copy and in
addition to it just by merging the incremental image copies
we can not get a full recovery of tablespaces...additional
archive log records and prior full image copies are
required. so from the recovery point of view full image copy
would be faster than these incremental image copy.....by the
way the question should be very precise and not be vauge as
it has been posted.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Why do we bind in db2?
What parameters are used to control the free space in DB2?
How to connect to db2 database from windows command line?
Which are the db2 tools to protect integrity of the database?
What language is db2 written in?
What is difference between rollback and commit?
What is the use of commit in db2?
Define data page.
What is a system catalog table in db2?
What is rct?
What is a db2 schema?
What is package in cobol db2?
What is the difference between spufi and qmf?
What is the physical storage length of date data type?
Is schema the same as database?