1. can automation testing replace manual testing ? If it so,
how ?
Answer Posted / mudaseer
no automation testing can never replace manual testing manual testing has its own advantages and drawbacks
advantage of manual testing are
(1)since manual testing is done by us we can recognize the mistakes
drawbacks
it is monotonous
advantages of automation
(1) it is fast and reduces human intervention
drawback
sometimes the tool cant recognize the mistake then we have do it manually so automation testing can never replace manual testing
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 0 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What are the main key components in web applications and client and server applications? And explain the differences between them?
What kind of input do we need from the end user to begin proper testing?
How to do integration testing on duster......
What do we need to build a quality QC team ? a QC manager with all junior QCs or a QC manager with all senior QCs?
hi, this is geetha, i have one doubt regarding the vulnerability testing. For sql injection testing is there any need for the tools to be installed. If it is what is tool and what is the method to test in sql injection testing. Plz Guide me
Difference between Stakeholder and Relevant Stakeholder?
What is test plan and contents available in a test plan?
What are the various test case for google analytics, api keys , pay pal if you know please post me a answer. And how we will test
In Quality Center, If we can reuse a non reusable test script as template test, then what is the need of defining reusable test scripts? What additional functionality does Reusable test scripts add when compared to non reusable test scripts?
Pls u can u r mail id to my personal mail id also if they dont want to give u r mail id n comman place
What is fuzz testing?
What is smoke test?
How do you get programmers to build testability support into their code?
What are differences in testing a client server and a web application?
wat is meant by frontend and backend testing