Among "Move" and "Move Corresponding", which is efficient
one and why ?
- 1 Answers
- 4261 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / jack
in system performance point of view MOVE is better than MOVE
CORRESPONDING
but in programming if you are moving the data from table1 to
table2 and the fields are arranged identically then MOVE
will work fine or else you have to use MOVE CORRESPONDING
MOVE CORRESPONDING can also be used when you are
transferring only some fields data from table1 to table2.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 5 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Difference between sy-tabix and sy-index? Can you check sy-subrc after perform?
What are the function of the transport system and workbench organiser? : abap data dictionary
How to write a bdc – how do you go about it?
What are the organizational related infotypes? : abap hr
What is check table?
What is repository info. Systems?
can anyone please tell me, in orient paper mill project which fields exits for creating report.
What is narrow casting and wide casting?
Why do we declare a method of a class final? What can be the purpose? Give a scenario.
What are the prerequisites for creating foreign key relationship?
How we can retrieve data using secondary index. Explain with simple example?
What is the difference between Check and Continue?
What are pool tables?
Have you set up a back ground job? How to create a background job without a variant ? : abap bdc
Workbench request are client dependent or client independent
