1.do we have some problem after in stall multiple exchange
server 2003 in the same forest(join existing org)?why do we
need to install that?
2.why do we need to install unattended installation?what
different and what is the benefit?
Answer Posted / raghu varada
1.No,We will not face any problem with multiple mail servers
in a same organisation.And maintaining multiple mail servers
in the organisation because of faulttalerance and to
minimize the Network Traffic.....consider if 1000 employees
r working ina organisation, each and everyone is having
respective mail ID,during the log on time all log on request
will be passed to one server,it might be cause some problems
while log on,so we need to maintain multiple mail servers.
2.Unattended is not a recommended one.
if an organisation is already having a mail server then we
will go for an unattended installation,to reduce the
installation time.benifit is only time consuming.
and need not run the forest prep in an second mail server.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 11 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What do I need in order to install exchange 2003?
What are the mailbox server and database level improvements in exchange server 2010 sp1?
What is the autodiscover service?
What is oma?
What is the role of mailbox server?
What microsoft tries to focus to deliver on exchange server 2010?
How do I stop users from going to a bookmarked /logon.asp page after conversion to 2003 owa?
Explain in exchange 5.5, I could have multiple mailboxes associated with a single user account. How do I do that in exchange 2003?
What’s a windows profile? When would you delete one, and what gets deleted?
Inform the features that are not available on owa 2013?
What is the stm file?
Explain how do I verify oma is functioning?
What are the differences between exchange 2000 and exchange 2003?
Explain how do I move the log files?
How can you tell the exact version of exchange you are running?