01 a pic s9(5) occupies how many bytes ?

Answer Posted / naveen

Kishore Sangu


S9(1)comp to s9(4)comp occupies 2 bytes.
s9(5)comp to s9(9)comp occupies 4 bytes.
S9(10)comp to S9(18)comp occupies 8 bytes.

Is This Answer Correct ?    7 Yes 3 No



Post New Answer       View All Answers


Please Help Members By Posting Answers For Below Questions

i want a program using by if, evaluate , string, unstring, perform, occurs?

4066


What are declaratives and what are their uses in cobol?

714


A table has two indexes defined. Which one will be used by the SEARCH?

759


how can we apply for HSBC exam(Mainframe) in India??? i went to their site and was told to submit my CV ,. etc..( totally confusing...)

1932


) what is the difference between AID and HANDLE AID?

1637






HOw can I get the negative sign while deduct high value from low value

1795


What is a scope terminator give example?

659


Why is it necessary that file needs to be opened in I-O mode for REWRITE?

748


EXPLAIN MAIN FRAME TESTING PROCESS...HOW TO FIX THE MAINFRAME BUGS?

2060


Give some examples of command terminators?

760


how can i see junk values in dclgen or in hostvariable of comp ?

2546


What happens when we move a comp-3 field to an edited (say z (9). Zz-)?

780


For rewrite, why is it mandatory that file needs to be opened?

623


What is comp-1 and comp-2?

766


Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks

2338