Among "Move" and "Move Corresponding", which is efficient one?
- 6 Answers
- 20353 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / prabha
as of me...
Move is the efficient compare to move-corresponding.
becuz.........
comming to move statement
if we use move it directly moving to appropriate field.
if we moving one-one field no problem..but if we are moving
total structure both should have same structure....
comming to move-corresponding ...
if we use this first it have to search for corresponding
field then it will do move operation...
so it is not that much efficient than move...
if i am wrong please correct me.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Define batch input session?
what are the various types of parameters and how are they distinguished from one another?
What are the buffering options in abap?
What is the disadvantage of a call by reference? : abap modularization
What are control tables? : abap data dictionary
How can an internal table with header line and one without header line bedistinguished when passed to a subroutine?
What is its? : abap hr
What is a size category?
Can a transparent table exist in data dictionary but not in the data base physically? : sap abap data dictionary
How would you set the formatting options statically and dynamically within a report?
What are the relational operations that can be performed on view in sap? : abap data dictionary
What is at exit-command:?
What are the functional areas? User groups?
Explain what are the events used for logical database?
hi..i hav developed an interactive report in which alv list display in basic list and 1st secondary list in alv grid display.I want to get summation(total) of the columns in the secondary list.I hav used 'do_sum' but i couldnt get.is there any other way to get summation(total) in secondary list which is an alv grid display
