Why Java is not purely object oriented?
- 50 Answers
- 70606 Views
- Elitecore, Persistent, Reliance, Wipro, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / elecen
Java is mostly an OOP language, but
We expect an OOP language to support:
Multiple Inheritance (not just implementations)
Overloading of operators
Java is inconvenient because:
Doesn't support Pointers :\
Both lightweight and heavyweight controls are CRAPPY!
You need to write hundreds of overhead code just to add some
typical functionality!
Doesn't provide access to some centralized message loop!!! :\
Java Sucks Big Time Because:
Takes like a zillion years to execute code that would take
just a few nano seconds in C++
Has HUGE loading times compared to C++
Is a memory leech!!!
Can't pass objects by reference!!! (mentioned pointers
already, didn't I? ;) :\
Java's nice because:
Runs anywhere a JRE is available :)
But then again, QT based apps run on Win, Linux and Mac, so
why bother?! :p
Bottom Line:
I have NOT a clue why they insist in teaching Java in
universities, while the BEST approaching method has ALWAYS
been C++ with some Assembly :D
Cheerz
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 2 Yes | 4 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Write a function to print Fibonacci series and Tribonacci series?
What is re-factoring in software?
What are the two main uses of volatile in Java?
Can we use switch statement with strings?
What is the main functionality of the remote reference layer?
Can a class declared as private be accessed outside it’s package?
Can we override constructors?
What is the difference between multitasking and multithreading in Java
What is the difference between the jdk 1.02 event model and the event-delegation model introduced with jdk 1.1?
Can extern variables be initialized?
Why do we need variables?
Why is stringbuffer not immutable?
What are constructors in java?
What is the difference between member variables initialization and assignment in a constructor?
What is the difference between hashmap and hashtable in java?
