Answer Posted / manju

The difference is that the CMM is a way to communicate
capabilities, and ISO is a way to communicate the process.
They are not necessarily incompatible.

The Capability Maturity Model is a very specific way of
classifying an organization's software development methods.
In a certain way, it tells how the quality of its software
designs is likely to be repeated.

ISO-9000 procedures describe a (possibly) definite
developemtn process but gives no indication of the likely
quality of the designs or whether multiple software efforts
are likely to produce software of similar quality.

Explain waterfall model? what will the testing team do in Requirement phase in this model and what happens in design phase?

1581

---

how many types of testings usually flow in different phases of SDLC

2205

---

what is regression testing, how effectively the QA lead / manager can implement this for product qualification

2113

---

what are the basic artifacts required for QA from development teams start qualification

2056

---

brief about the methodologies to evaluate weightage of test cases and what are the basic parameters to be considered

2442

---

How does development of software differ from that of hardware from a quality viewpoint?

1060

---

what are the priliminary expectations from smoke testing from developer and QA point of view

1915

---

Explain the deployment process?

1594

---

what are the usual metrics one have to apply for SW improvement projects

2070

---

What are the main objectives of configuration management and version control?

956

---

what are the disadvantages of selenium IDE..?

1599

---

Give a suitable definition of software quality and briefly describe the rationale for your definition.

968

---

explain the basic QA plan to co-op with development plan for effective delivery of the product

1943

---

explain the methodologies / ways to create the test cases for QA

2015

---

all sap abap ale (idoc) interview questions

3895

---