Answer Posted / karthikeyant

Implicit:

By eliminating unnecessary casts, implicit conversions can
improve source code readability. However, because implicit
conversions can occur without the programmer's specifying
them, care must be taken to prevent unpleasant surprises.
In general, implicit conversion operators should never
throw exceptions and never lose information so that they
can be used safely without the programmer's awareness. If a
conversion operator cannot meet those criteria, it should
be marked explicit.

class MyType
{
public static implicit operator int(MyType m)
{
// code to convert from MyType to int
}
}

MyType x;
// implicitly call MyType's MyType-to-int conversion
operator
int i = x;

Explicit:
declares a user-defined type conversion operator that must
be invoked with a cast. For example, this operator converts
from a class called Fahrenheit to a class called Celsius:

// Must be defined inside a class called Farenheit:
public static explicit operator Celsius(Farenheit f)
{
return new Celsius((5.0f/9.0f)*(f.degrees-32));
}

Farenheit f = new Farenheit(100.0f);
Celsius c = (Celsius)f;

What are strongly typed objects?

975

---

What is the base class for array types?

1082

---

Can we set image Source dynamically using C# in WPF application?

1125

---

What is a private method in c#?

1103

---

Are objects passed by reference in c#?

1039

---

Can a abstract class have a constructor?

931

---

What are the boolean data types in c#?

1060

---

Are c# generics the same as c++ templates?

977

---

What does return do in for loop?

972

---

What does the parsefloat function do?

961

---

How do you escape a character?

986

---

When can a derived class override a base class member?

950

---

What is verbatim string literal in c#?

1034

---

What is the use of partial methods?

1119

---

How many types of namespaces available in version4?

993

---