Answer Posted / vivek
1>c is an procedural language and c++ is an object oriented.
2>c uses a TOP DOWN approach and c++ BOTTOM UP.
3>c++ introduces the idea of Data hiding using class..shere
in c there is no such facility for that purpose
4>c++ introduce the concept of the message passing with that
objects can communicate.
5>c++ has the inheritence, using it we can reuse our code.
6>Using polymorphism of c++ we can achieve the overloading
of operator and functions, but it is not possible in c.
there may be more difference on this but these are the main..
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 19 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Whats is abstraction in oops?
What is difference between oop and pop?
What is the point of polymorphism?
Give two or more real cenario of virtual function and vertual object
How long to learn object oriented programming?
What is pure oop?
What is interface? When and where is it used?
What is the fundamental idea of oop?
class CTest { public: void someMethod() { int nCount = 0; cout << "This is some method --> " << nCount; } }; int main() { CTest *pctest; pctest->someMethod(); return 0; } It will executes the someMethod() and displays the value too. how is it possible with our creating memory for the class . i think iam not creating object for the class. Thanks in Advance... Prakash
What are objects in oop?
What are the 5 oop principles?
Question In a class, there is a reference or pointer of an object of another class embedded, and the memory is either allocated or assigned to the new object created for this class. In the constructor, parameters are passed to initialize the data members and the embedded object reference to get inialized. What measures or design change should be advised for proper destruction and avioding memory leaks, getting pointers dangling for the embedded object memory allocation? Please suggest. Question Submitted By :: Sunil Kumar I also faced this Question!! Rank Answer Posted By Re: In a class, there is a reference or pointer of an object of another class embedded, and the memory is either allocated or assigned to the new object created for this class. In the constructor, parameters are passed to initialize the data members and the embedded object reference to get inialized. What measures or design change should be advised for proper destruction and avioding memory leaks, getting pointers dangling for the embedded object memory allocation? Please suggest. Answer # 1 use copy constructors 0 Shanthila There is something to be taken care in destructor, in copy constructor, suppose the memory is assigned to the embedded member object pointer with the parameter passed value, but if some other objects of different class also are pointing to this memory, then if some one deletes the object then this class member pointer object will become dangling, or if the object is not deleted properly then there will be memory leak. Please suggest the design change required to handle or avoid this situation
Can a varargs method be overloaded?
What are the 4 main oop principles?
when to use 'mutable' keyword and when to use 'const cast' in c++