Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
What’s the main differences between exchange 5.5 and
Exchange 2000/2003
- 5 Answers
- 18034 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / muthiah nagarajan
The primary differences are...
-Exchange 2000/2003 does not have its own directory or
directory service; it uses Active Directory instead.
-Exchange 2000/2003 uses native components of Windows 2000
(namely, IIS and its SMTP, NNTP, W3SVC and other
components, Kerberos and others) for many core functions.
-SMTP is now a full peer to RPC, and is it the default
transport protocol between Exchange 2000/2003 servers.
-Exchange 2000/2003 supports Active/Active clustering and
was recently certified for Windows 2000 Datacenter/2003.
-Exchange 2000/2003 scales much higher.
-It boasts conferencing services and instant messaging.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 27 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
What are the roles in ms exchange 2013?
How do I limit which outlook client versions can access my server?
Explain the exchange 2003 forestprep?
Why do I have to disable link state routing?
Explain how can I prevent a user from sending and receiving internet mail?
What are the important features of transport pipeline?
What’s new in flexibility and reliability?
Can I use exchange 5.5s owa to access a mailbox on an exchange 2003 server?
Do I still have to cycle the services on fail back like in 2000 active/passive mode?
What is a site mailbox?
How do you restrict distribution lists?
What ports does the exchange server use?
Explain the exchange 2010 server roles and their functions in short?
Can the exchange 2007 server roles be deployed and configured on the same physical hardware?
What are the hardware requirements to install exchange server 2007?
