Interested to Buy Any Domain ? << Click Here >> for more details...
What is the maximum length of a field you can define using
COMP-3?
- 4 Answers
- 37506 Views
- Complex System, Infosys, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / vivek ar
The first answr is correct .It is indeeed 10
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 5 Yes | 3 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Why occurs cannot be used in 01 level in COBOL?
Explain what you understand by passing by value.
Write the code implementing the perform … varying.
What are the rules of the move verb?
how can we apply for HSBC exam(Mainframe) in India??? i went to their site and was told to submit my CV ,. etc..( totally confusing...)
Write some characteristics of cobol as means of business language.
i made it to stage 3 of an interview process wednessday they will quiz my knowledge again face to face for an analyst role recruiter said it will be based on Business requirements system is cobol and good ideas what they might ask etc
how do you reference the variable unblock file formats from cobol programs
explain sorting techniques in cobol program?
)If there are 10 steps in GDG, if I want to refer the step2 after step5 . what should I do?
what is search and searchall?what is the diffrence between them?give an best example?
How did the release of cobol/370 version 1.3 improve the performance of release 1.1?
Is it possible that the redefines clause has different picture clauses compared to the one it redefined?
I have a program with an Array of 5000 occurences which is being passed from 5 sub levels to the front end screen. Thess 5 programs using each 5*2 = 10 different arrays with size as 5000. This is causing the transaction to utilize more storage consupmtion. I am looking to reduce the storage consumption. As part of that initially i thought Dynamic array may solve my problem. After viewing the comments given i see its same as normal array. IS there any other way we can resolve this issue?
Our issue is there seems to be a disconnect, or no link, between our SELECT statement and our SD. We had SELECT SORT-FILE and SELECT SORT-FILE ASSIGN TO SORTWRK. ASSIGN TO SORTWRK1 SORTWRK2 SORTWRK3 SORTWRK4. with SD SORT_FILE RECORD CONTAINS 7833 CHARACTERS. In either case, at run time, the system ignored our SORTWRK# DD statements and allocated 16 sort works with the SORTWK## naming convention. Any ideas why the system does not recognize the connection? We do not even need the SORTWRK DD statements. Thanks
