When conducting a review of business process re-engineering,
an IS auditor found that a key preventive control had been
removed. In this case, the IS auditor should:
A. inform management of the finding and determine if
management is willing to accept the potential material risk
of not having that preventing control.
B. determine if a detective control has replaced the
preventive control during the process and if so, not report
the removal of the preventive control.
C. recommend that this and all control procedures that
existed before the process was reengineered be included in
the new process.
D. develop a continuous audit approach to monitor the
effects of the removal of the preventive control.
- 2 Answers
- 9932 Views
- I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer Posted / guest
Answer: A
Choice A is the best answer. Management should be informed
immediately to determine if they are willing to accept the
potential material risk of not having that preventive
control in place. The existence of a detective control
instead of a preventive control usually increases the risks
that a material problem may occur. Often during a BPR many
non-value-added controls will be eliminated. This is good,
unless they increase the business and financial risks. The
IS auditor may wish to monitor or recommend that management
monitor the new process, but this should be done only after
management has been informed and accepts the risk of not
having the preventive control in place.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 12 Yes | 0 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
