Difference between Composition and Aggregation
- 2 Answers
- 23007 Views
- Protech, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / benjamin jacob
Composition : Defines a strong-coupled relationship between
two entities, where the one entity is part of another, and
both need each other for their existence. e.g. Human body
and the Heart.
Aggregation : Defines a weak-coupled relationship between
two entities, where one entity could be part of another, but
either can exist without the other, independantly. e.g.
School and teacher.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 85 Yes | 5 No |
Answer / paul howard
Composition can be used to model by-value aggregation which
is semantically equivalent to an attribute. In fact
composition was originally called aggregation-by-value in an
earlier UML draft with “normal” aggregation being thought of
as aggregation-by-reference. The definitions have changed
slightly but the general ideas still apply. The distinction
between aggregation and composition is more of a design
concept and is not usually relevant during analysis.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 14 Yes | 5 No |
what is virtual function and pure virtual function ?
What does the keyword virtual represented in the method definition?
Why do we use oops concepts? What is its advantage?
What is the difference abstract class and interface?
What is serialization? How do we implement serialization actually?
What is SRD(System Requirement document), FSD (Functional Specification Document), RSD (Requiremnet specific document)? If these are different document wat are there contents?
1 Answers College School Exams Tests, HP, Infosys,
What is the difference between an error and an exception?
How many methods are there in the externalizable interface?
What is an abstraction?
What if we make the method as abstract in another interface?
Explain basic concepts of OOPS?
Where shall I go for Package Diagram?
Design Patterns 
