Difference between Composition and Aggregation
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / benjamin jacob
Composition : Defines a strong-coupled relationship between
two entities, where the one entity is part of another, and
both need each other for their existence. e.g. Human body
and the Heart.
Aggregation : Defines a weak-coupled relationship between
two entities, where one entity could be part of another, but
either can exist without the other, independantly. e.g.
School and teacher.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 85 Yes | 5 No |
Answer / paul howard
Composition can be used to model by-value aggregation which
is semantically equivalent to an attribute. In fact
composition was originally called aggregation-by-value in an
earlier UML draft with “normal” aggregation being thought of
as aggregation-by-reference. The definitions have changed
slightly but the general ideas still apply. The distinction
between aggregation and composition is more of a design
concept and is not usually relevant during analysis.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 14 Yes | 5 No |
Can you create an instance for an abstract class?
What is hybrid inheritance?
Explain OOPS.
What is super keyword?
Suppose a class acts an Actor in the problem domain, how to represent it in the static model?
What is an abstract property. Give an example?
What are the properties that are defined in an object model?
What is the use if instanceof keyword?
Why is class hierarchies managed in object-oriented programming?
How do you represent static members and abstract classes in Class Diagram?
2 Answers InfoAxon Technologies, Protech,
Can we access interface static method using interface references?
Difference between abstraction and implementation hiding ?