Answer / guest

Cause: An ellipsis and a non-ellipsis type appeared at the
same position in separate overload candidates. Currently, if
ellipsis types are used they must appear in ALL overload
candidates with the same name (regardless of the number or
types of their formal parameters) at the same position in
the formal parameter list.

Action: Make sure that ellipsis types appear at the same
position in all overload candidates.

Please add more information about this Error

O2U-00206: Some characters in a type name were not legal identifier characters

1 Answers  

---

NNL-00982: Not forwarded, no servers found: number

1 Answers  

---

PLS-01473: Use <> instead of != or ~=

1 Answers  

---

ORA-40212: invalid target data type in input data for string function

1 Answers  

---

ORA-00608: testing error [string] [string] [string] [string] [string]

1 Answers  

---

---

ORA-00962: too many group-by / order-by expressions

1 Answers  

---

ORA-17612: Failed to discover Oracle Disk Manager library, return value string

1 Answers  

---

PCC-00127: %s

1 Answers  

---

IMP-00073: FILE locator "string" "string" is truncated to "string" "string" in server character set

1 Answers  

---

PLS-00607: SQLJ Object Types can have only SQLJ Types as its supertype or subtype

1 Answers  

---

ORA-19003: Missing XML root element name

1 Answers  

---

UDE-00053: unrecognized client command 'string'

1 Answers  

---