Answer / sagi

Apache 2 is a better overall design.
That being said, 1.3 is a rock. It has been tested for
years and is very stable and has few, if any, serious bugs
left in the codebase.

Performance, Depends on the OS and the hardware.

apache2 seams to have a big advantage on any setup favoring
heavy threading. I have tested it on a sun T-2000 and it
destroys apache1.3.
I have been told that it pretty handily wins on almost any
windows box as well (But havent personaly seen this).
I know that an opteron or xeon running FreeBSD doesnt
really care. They both seam to do well when tuned
correctly.
I stay with 1.3 at the moment as I am still more
comfortable with it, and I runn a lot of OpenBSD and they
have done a good amount of code auditing on the 1.3.29
branch that they are using in their default install.

If your linux machine shows a ~(tilde) in most filenames on your dos or windows partition,what is the mistake you have made?How do you get back the long filenames?

2 Answers  

---

What do you mean by nice value?

4 Answers  

---

What are permissions in UNIX?

5 Answers   BMC, University,

---

How to recover a system whose root password has lost?

5 Answers   SoftNet,

---

What does iostat do?

4 Answers   IBM,

---

What does the ?route? command do?

2 Answers  

---

How do you execute a UNIX command in the background?

2 Answers  

---

Explain the read, write, and execute permissions on a UNIX directory.

1 Answers  

---

how to create a file system quota in HP-UX?

1 Answers   HCL,

---

What are the read or write or execute bits on a directory mean?

2 Answers  

---

How will you run the script in UNIX?

5 Answers   BMC,

---

If the terminal is not showing the login prompt,what's the 1st thing you should check?and how do you solve the problem?

2 Answers   TCS,

---