What are the main differences between Apache 1.x and 2.x?
- 1 Answers
- 7884 Views
- IBM, I also Faced
- E-Mail Answers
Answer / sagi
Apache 2 is a better overall design.
That being said, 1.3 is a rock. It has been tested for
years and is very stable and has few, if any, serious bugs
left in the codebase.
Performance, Depends on the OS and the hardware.
apache2 seams to have a big advantage on any setup favoring
heavy threading. I have tested it on a sun T-2000 and it
destroys apache1.3.
I have been told that it pretty handily wins on almost any
windows box as well (But havent personaly seen this).
I know that an opteron or xeon running FreeBSD doesnt
really care. They both seam to do well when tuned
correctly.
I stay with 1.3 at the moment as I am still more
comfortable with it, and I runn a lot of OpenBSD and they
have done a good amount of code auditing on the 1.3.29
branch that they are using in their default install.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 3 No |
Is this the command to connect oracle from unix? sqlplus -s username/password. Then what is the -S here...????
What is YACC?
in unix profile contains
How many VI editor modes do you know?
i am prepairing for 2+ yrs exp in oracle/unix production support,can u tell me which type issue comes in server plz help
why unix commands simpler rather than complex task
what is output mkvg pvname
In detail elaborate the system? What is driver?
very first process created by kernell?
what is the name os the first os and tell me the year when it was discovered
which is the best book for learning unix and linux?
What is a level 0 backup?
Unix Commands 
