Answer / sagi

Apache 2 is a better overall design.
That being said, 1.3 is a rock. It has been tested for
years and is very stable and has few, if any, serious bugs
left in the codebase.

Performance, Depends on the OS and the hardware.

apache2 seams to have a big advantage on any setup favoring
heavy threading. I have tested it on a sun T-2000 and it
destroys apache1.3.
I have been told that it pretty handily wins on almost any
windows box as well (But havent personaly seen this).
I know that an opteron or xeon running FreeBSD doesnt
really care. They both seam to do well when tuned
correctly.
I stay with 1.3 at the moment as I am still more
comfortable with it, and I runn a lot of OpenBSD and they
have done a good amount of code auditing on the 1.3.29
branch that they are using in their default install.

process id for kernell process?

4 Answers   TCS,

---

Is this the command to connect oracle from unix? sqlplus -s username/password. Then what is the -S here...????

1 Answers   TCS,

---

What is Expansion swap?

1 Answers   KISSI,

---

what is output mkvg pvname

0 Answers  

---

What is the difference between a soft link and a hard link?

1 Answers  

---

What does iostat do?

4 Answers   IBM,

---

What is file constructing in UNIX/AIX ?

2 Answers   IBM, TCS,

---

What does init do? What does inetd do?

1 Answers  

---

How does the inode map to data block of a file?

3 Answers  

---

How do I log into a remote Unix machine(as a root/normal user)?Please specify with command user and argument.

3 Answers  

---

What is an inode?

8 Answers  

---

very first process created by kernell?

4 Answers   TCS,

---