Answer / sagi

Apache 2 is a better overall design.
That being said, 1.3 is a rock. It has been tested for
years and is very stable and has few, if any, serious bugs
left in the codebase.

Performance, Depends on the OS and the hardware.

apache2 seams to have a big advantage on any setup favoring
heavy threading. I have tested it on a sun T-2000 and it
destroys apache1.3.
I have been told that it pretty handily wins on almost any
windows box as well (But havent personaly seen this).
I know that an opteron or xeon running FreeBSD doesnt
really care. They both seam to do well when tuned
correctly.
I stay with 1.3 at the moment as I am still more
comfortable with it, and I runn a lot of OpenBSD and they
have done a good amount of code auditing on the 1.3.29
branch that they are using in their default install.

I am trying to unmount a remote file system,but I do not unmount that file system.How can i know the user name (i.e.,user who is using that file system).....write the command with argument

2 Answers  

---

How can u doing testing in Unix environment ?

2 Answers   TCS,

---

which is the best book for learning unix and linux?

6 Answers  

---

In this command sqlplus -s username/password what is -S and what's the use..???

1 Answers   IIIP, TCS,

---

What is the difference between Swapping and Paging?

4 Answers   IBM,

---

What is a Region?

1 Answers  

---

what is mean by kernal?

9 Answers   Excel,

---

what is difference between kernel and shell?

18 Answers   Juniper Networks,

---

What is an incremental backup?

2 Answers  

---

Why do inode number start from 1 and not 0 ?

3 Answers  

---

how to create a file system quota in HP-UX?

1 Answers   HCL,

---

How will you run the script in UNIX?

5 Answers   BMC,

---