Answer / sagi

Apache 2 is a better overall design.
That being said, 1.3 is a rock. It has been tested for
years and is very stable and has few, if any, serious bugs
left in the codebase.

Performance, Depends on the OS and the hardware.

apache2 seams to have a big advantage on any setup favoring
heavy threading. I have tested it on a sun T-2000 and it
destroys apache1.3.
I have been told that it pretty handily wins on almost any
windows box as well (But havent personaly seen this).
I know that an opteron or xeon running FreeBSD doesnt
really care. They both seam to do well when tuned
correctly.
I stay with 1.3 at the moment as I am still more
comfortable with it, and I runn a lot of OpenBSD and they
have done a good amount of code auditing on the 1.3.29
branch that they are using in their default install.

win 3.1 is a

0 Answers   TISL,

---

what is the time for incident, problem and change management tickets?

0 Answers   CGI,

---

What are the files in /etc directory?

6 Answers   TCS, Wipro,

---

What does mknod do? What?s a named pipe?

1 Answers   Datamatics,

---

How do you create special files like named pipes and device files?

1 Answers   Wipro,

---

What is INODE?

6 Answers   BMC,

---

What is a FIFO?

2 Answers  

---

What is the job responsibility of a System Administrator (UNIX/LINUX),briefly describe (Also point out system admin's daily job details),specify job type & job description?

2 Answers   HP, ICS Integrated Computer Solutions, TCS,

---

What are permissions in UNIX?

5 Answers   BMC, University,

---

What are the mount and unmount system calls?

1 Answers   HCL,

---

What is virtual memory?

2 Answers   BMC,

---

what is output mkvg pvname

0 Answers  

---