Why isn't XHTML2 backwards compatible?
Answer / guest
It is, but in a different way to how previous versions of
HTML were backwards compatible.
Because earlier versions of HTML were special-purpose
languages, it was necessary to ensure a level of backwards
compatibility with new versions so that new documents would
still be usable in older browsers. For instance, this is why
the <meta> element has its content in an attribute rather
than in the content of the element, since it would have
shown up in older browsers.
However, thanks to XML and stylesheets, such strict
element-wise backwards compatibility is no longer necessary,
since an XML-based browser, of which at the time of writing
means more than 95% of browsers in use, can process new
markup languages without having to be updated. Much of XHTML
2 works already in existing browsers, browsers that are not
pre-programmed to accept XHTML2. Much works, but not all:
when forms and tables were added to HTML, people had to wait
for new version of browsers; similarly some parts of XHTML
2, such as XForms and XML Events, still require user agents
that understand that functionality.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 1 Yes | 0 No |
What is the difference between basefont and font tag?
What is the use of <table> tag?
What is the correct definition of an html element?
Is html still used 2019?
Describe in brief HTML Lists?
What does </ p mean in html?
How do you pronounce bvlgari?
Differentiate between localStorage and sessionStorage objects.
Will width property uses full width of browser?
What is the html5 stack?
What are the various formatting tags in html5?
What is browser viewport?