what do u mean by market place

Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback



what do u mean by market place ..

Answer / chandana

Market is a place where goods are bought and sold to the
final consumer. It can also be defined as a place where the
goods are sold from the supplier to the final consumer.
supplier - Wholesaler - Retailer - consumer

Is This Answer Correct ?    27 Yes 1 No

what do u mean by market place ..

Answer / priya

where you can buy and sell your products

Is This Answer Correct ?    11 Yes 2 No

what do u mean by market place ..

Answer / faheem pasha

Market is a place in which the both seller and buyer come
and meet together to sell his product

Is This Answer Correct ?    5 Yes 0 No

what do u mean by market place ..

Answer / s.jayaraj

buying and selling the goods or product its the market place

Is This Answer Correct ?    6 Yes 2 No

what do u mean by market place ..

Answer / prince

Market is the place where goods and services buy and sell at
some areas or a market.

Is This Answer Correct ?    2 Yes 0 No

what do u mean by market place ..

Answer / ajay rajput

the market place in which place the customer are receiving these needed services and products from the producers.other hand the goods & services are sold producers to the customers for their satisfaction level.

Is This Answer Correct ?    0 Yes 1 No

Post New Answer

More Business Administration Interview Questions

What challenges do you foresee and how do you plan to overcome these?

0 Answers  


You have done your BCA, Then Why did you choose MBA?

2 Answers   Colgate, State Bank Of India SBI, TCS, UBS,


what are the functional areas of siemens?

0 Answers  


Why did you decide to apply to this business school?

2 Answers   ISBR Business School,


What are u looking for MBA program

2 Answers  






i am a homoeo doctor,bt now i am shortlisted for the post of sbi clerk.Can you suggest what answer should i give if the interviewer asks me why you are discontinuing your medical practice?

0 Answers  


If one always ought to act so as to produce the best possible circumstances, then morality is extremely demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would seem strange to punish those intending to do good by sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, then they will preclude the personal projects that humans find most fulfilling. From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons. First, discussion of the simple principle provides an excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's starting point tells us about the nature of his project. Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He [must do so] because his work is best interpreted as intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral principles. [Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over- demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one find a source of moral values divorced from human preferences. Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well- intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to give them principles that represent their considered moral judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to find the best interpretation of our Constitution. This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of motivating force for which moral philosophy has traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification and ignore the entire work. On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying the content of moral principles and granting a motivating force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not seem any more likely to convince those that would reject Murphy's premises. 1) The author suggests that the application of Murphy's philosophy to the situations of two different groups: a) would help to solve the problems of one group but not of the other. b) could result in the derivation of two radically different moral principles. c) would be contingent on the two groups sharing the same fundamental beliefs. d) could reconcile any differences between the two groups. 2) Suppose an individual who firmly believes in keeping promises has promised to return a weapon to a person she knows to be extremely dangerous. According to Murphy, which of the following, if true, would WEAKEN the notion that she should return the weapon? a) She also firmly believes that it is morally wrong to assist in any way in a potentially violent act. b) She believes herself to be well-intentioned in matters of right and wrong. c) The belief that one should keep promises is shared by most members of her community. d) She derived her moral beliefs from first-principle ethical philosophy. 3) The passage implies that a moral principle derived from applying Murphy's philosophy to a particular group would be applicable to another group if: a) the first group recommended the principle to the second group. b) the moral viewpoints of the two groups do not converge. c) the members of the second group have no firmly held beliefs. d) the second group shares the same fundamental beliefs as the first group. 4) According to the passage, the existence of individuals who entirely lack a moral sense: a) confirms the notion that moral principles should be derived from the considered judgments of individuals. b) suggests a potential disadvantage of Murphy's philosophical approach. c) supports Murphy's belief that reason is necessary in cases in which intuitions are conflicting or confused. d) proves that first-principle strategies of ethical theorizing will have no more influence over the behavior of individuals than will Murphy's philosophical approach. 5) Which of the following can be inferred about "doing philosophy from the inside out?" a) Murphy was the first philosopher to employ such an approach. b) It allows no place for rational argument in the formation of ethical principles. c) It is fundamentally different from the practice of first-principle philosophy. d) It is designed to dismiss objections to the "simple principle." 6) A school board is debating whether or not to institute a dress code for the school's students. According to Murphy, the best way to come to an ethical decision would be to: a) consult the fundamental beliefs of the board members. b) analyze the results of dress codes instituted at other schools. c) survey the students as to whether or not they would prefer a dress code. d) determine whether or note a dress code has ever been instituted in the school's history.

4 Answers   Accenture, CTS, Patni, Syntel, Verizon, Wipro,


in mba personal interview, if someone ask me that you choose hr as your career why not marketing or finance?

0 Answers  


What is Planning horizon and how does it impact MRP and MPS run results ?

0 Answers  


what is funk cost?

1 Answers  


iam going to face viva vioce of 1st year,pls send me some viva voice queries&answers

1 Answers  


Why would you be sucsessfull at recruitment

2 Answers  


Categories
  • Business Administration Interview Questions Business Administration (517)
  • Marketing Sales Interview Questions Marketing Sales (1279)
  • Banking Finance Interview Questions Banking Finance (3208)
  • Human Resources Interview Questions Human Resources (745)
  • Personnel Management Interview Questions Personnel Management (68)
  • Hotel Management Interview Questions Hotel Management (29)
  • Industrial Management Interview Questions Industrial Management (113)
  • Infrastructure Management Interview Questions Infrastructure Management (14)
  • IT Management Interview Questions IT Management (97)
  • Supply Chain Management Interview Questions Supply Chain Management (16)
  • Operations Management Interview Questions Operations Management (39)
  • Funding Interview Questions Funding (79)
  • Insurance Interview Questions Insurance (494)
  • Waste Management Interview Questions Waste Management (1)
  • Labor Management Interview Questions Labor Management (48)
  • Non Technical Interview Questions Non Technical (73)
  • Business Management AllOther Interview Questions Business Management AllOther (546)