In performance wise distinct is good or group by is good?
eg:select name from emp group by name;
select distinct name from emp;
Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback
Answer / madhu
This question is asked many times to me. What is difference
between DISTINCT and GROUP BY?
A DISTINCT and GROUP BY usually generate the same query
plan, so performance should be the same across both query
constructs. GROUP BY should be used to apply aggregate
operators to each group. If all you need is to remove
duplicates then use DISTINCT. If you are using sub-queries
execution plan for that query varies so in that case you
need to check the execution plan before making decision of
which is faster.
Example of DISTINCT:
SELECT DISTINCT Employee, Rank
FROM Employees
Example of GROUP BY:
SELECT Employee, Rank
FROM Employees
GROUP BY Employee, Rank
Is This Answer Correct ? | 14 Yes | 3 No |
Answer / ghorban adabi
I have test DISTINCT and GROUP BY query on a table in my
site db with 7800 record. the results that turned GROUP BY
was faster than DISTINCT!!!
GROUP BY result -> Query took 0.0094 sec
DISTINCT result -> Query took 0.0133 sec
Is This Answer Correct ? | 5 Yes | 0 No |
In SQL Server 2000:
-------------------
A DISTINCT and GROUP BY usually generate the same query
plan, so performance should be the same across both query
constructs. GROUP BY should be used to apply aggregate
operators to each group. If all you need is to remove
duplicates then use DISTINCT. If you are using sub-queries
execution plan for that query varies so in that case you
need to check the execution plan before making decision of
which is faster.
Example of DISTINCT:
--------------------
Query:
select DISTINCT Book_Title,COUNT(*) from bookdetails
Answer:
Server: Msg 8118, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Column 'bookdetails.Book_Title' is invalid in the select
list because it is not contained in an aggregate function
and there is no GROUP BY clause.
Example of Group By:
--------------------
Query:
select Book_Title,COUNT(*) from bookdetails group by
Book_Title
Answer:
ASP 1
C 1
C++ 1
Oracle 1
SQL Server 1
VB.Net 3
Visual Bsic 1
In this Answer, the VB.NET is Duplicate, it having this
table in 3 times.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 5 Yes | 3 No |
Answer / anil sharma
Group apply before where clause and distinct apply after
where clause.
So group by is good.
Is This Answer Correct ? | 4 Yes | 10 No |
Answer / hitesh kumar vyas s
Performance wise Distinct is more effective than group by.
Since in group by it has to group and then provide the
result but this is not the case in distinct
Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 11 No |
How to select some specific rows from a table in ms sql server?
What is sql server schema compare? How we can compare two database schemas?
I create a separate index on each column of a table. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach? : Sql server database administration
What is a data source file?
How do you find the error, how can you know the number of rows effected by last SQL statement?
What is bcp? When does it use?
What are the types of backup and tell me the difference between full and differential backup?
Does dbcc checkdb requires db to be in single_user mode? : sql server database administration
What does the not null constraint do?
What do you mean by 'normalization'?
0 Answers Ernst Young, Thomson Reuters,
Where do you think the users names and passwords will be stored in sql server?
Table - Products has number of products as below Productid ProductName 1 iPhone 2 iPad 3 BlackBerry Table - SalesPersonProduct has the below records Salespersonid productid S1 1 S1 2 S1 3 S2 1 S3 2 Write a SQL query that returns the number of sales for each product